What I am showing you is the official numbers. This data is corroborated in primary sources going back over a hundred years. I will be presenting a much more comprehensive report on this soon.

Why do you suggest they are incorrect? More importantly, why would they lie? On the contrary, they have been lying about the opposite for a very long time. They have been inducing a panic in the populations of all countries with regards to "too much population." This (among many other efforts) drives people to have fewer children, thus accomplishing their goal. The opposition party (Republican in America) complains about exactly such incentives to have children in minority populations as you describe, thus creating the belief of "too much population" on that side as well. But America is even worse with regards to replacement levels, and perhaps more important, the numbers are even worse for minority populations, despite the constant narrative to the opposite (which it sounds like it is the same in your country).

All sides are controlled by the "too much population" narrative, but the numbers tell a very different story. They don't advertise those numbers, but they are available if you look.