Graham Hancock has some interesting and unconventional views of human history. He believes there was an advanced human civilization existed 13,000 year ago and was destroyed in a huge flood caused by the end of the ice age.
By "advanced" he is not claiming they had airplanes any flying saucers, but advanced, like the Egyptians were.
The hatred towards this man and his theories seem to be imbalanced for what he suggests. The MSM and establishment calls his theories "white supremacist" and "nazi" as they take credits away from cultures of "people of color". I'm pretty sure he never suggested any pigmentation or color of earlier civilizations.
The MSM and and archeology routinely claim that he says aliens brought technology to earth, etc, although I'm pretty sure he has not mentioned this.
So why so much animosity towards this? If it is true? So what? If it is false, so what? Is it archeologists who are threatened because they spent 50 years of their life teaching the world was one way, and now learning they may have been wrong?
Or is there some larger threat to the establishment here?
Edit: I'm only a little educated on this individual, so I apologize in advance if any of this is incorrect. Just that my experience is that when a person or idea receives many attacks by the establishment, it usually means they are over target.
Probably, I recognize your handle. Probably on viruses?
Jonathan seagull etc.
Ah yes, that was it. Great book for a young mind!
Illusions..the next one is better in a way...seagull is what you read into it..in my case reincarnation which I was coming to believe without seeing anything about it but on levels of intelligence in people or not as the case may be.
Illusions taught me to question..something I didn't do a lot of...did not do a lot of thinking ..mainly right brain intuition etc so illusions for me was valuable although thinking once I started was annoying at times!!
Q also taught me to think in a different way...
Young people need to learn critical thinking....illusions is good at that. I spent years on four lines in that paperback...
Nice to bump into you again
If you have any website gems please let me have them .
Totally gripped....watched four...conversation with ??one of Clif highs recommends I have never watched.. .a q and a session. ..phoenix for dummies This amazing world of anomalies
I have been on this guys trail for a while....had to finish off my childhood pattern first
He is so interesting..he keeps going off on tangents which is maddening but they are interesting too!
How can people say life is boring!
Haha, you might have lost me here uk9994. Are you talking about Jason Brashears videos?
I listen to Clif High from time-to-time but you need a ton of discernment when doing so IMHO. He's wrong about at least half of everything he says as far as I can tell. But he certainly is an interesting storehouse of knowledge that occasionally produces some real gems. I liked his discussions about the Oera Linda book and the Frisian culture in particular last year. He's got a good take on the khazarian "name stealers" as well which he surmises from this book. But as to his "predictions"...well.... oy vey!! Let's just say he's correct less often than a broken clock! And this is supposedly how he became so well-known. A real head-scratcher to me. I think people just like to marvel at how much stuff he's educated himself on that they just accept that he must be right about it.
As to Brashears, who I think you're talking about, yes, he darts off on tangents all the time. He knows so much he can't help it. And I do agree, regardless, his tangents are all interesting to listen to by and large.