Graham Hancock has some interesting and unconventional views of human history. He believes there was an advanced human civilization existed 13,000 year ago and was destroyed in a huge flood caused by the end of the ice age.
By "advanced" he is not claiming they had airplanes any flying saucers, but advanced, like the Egyptians were.
The hatred towards this man and his theories seem to be imbalanced for what he suggests. The MSM and establishment calls his theories "white supremacist" and "nazi" as they take credits away from cultures of "people of color". I'm pretty sure he never suggested any pigmentation or color of earlier civilizations.
The MSM and and archeology routinely claim that he says aliens brought technology to earth, etc, although I'm pretty sure he has not mentioned this.
So why so much animosity towards this? If it is true? So what? If it is false, so what? Is it archeologists who are threatened because they spent 50 years of their life teaching the world was one way, and now learning they may have been wrong?
Or is there some larger threat to the establishment here?
Edit: I'm only a little educated on this individual, so I apologize in advance if any of this is incorrect. Just that my experience is that when a person or idea receives many attacks by the establishment, it usually means they are over target.
Hahaha, loved that "unvaxxed woman of their dreams"! :)
Yeah, Clif is a mixed bag. Fun to listen to but should always taken with a BIG grain of salt IMHO.
Yes, Gurdjieff was a wise master speaking from EXPERIENCE which is key. He was self-realized so his words echo throughout eternity. The tricky part is, gaining an understanding, "Grokking" what he's saying. This isn't easy for the masses. It requires an elevation in consciousness which comes via grace, not "intellectual ability".
Agree with Brashears on Christianity as well. I could go a lot further than he does however. The unfortunate matter in Christianity is that the definition of all the key words has been altered through the millennia. And Strong's Concordance isn't of much help either. Some, but not much, as many times there are dozens of potential definitions to choose from. It's a hot mess. But I steer clear of discussing this matter with large, anonymous audiences as the great majority are none-too-pleased with hearing this. Biblical scripture is loaded with truths when one has "the eyes to see and ears to hear". Unfortunately, this does not describe the majority - yet.
But yeah, Jason has the right neutral-take on Christianity. He's very tactful and respectful of his listeners views and questions. It's not a black and white "it's either true or it's false" argument. All depends on HOW a person interprets and reads each word.
Anyway, good luck on finding that unvaxxed vixen my friend! I know she's out there!!!