I thought this was a boneheaded idea from a bad advisor.
But this is one the most clear proofs they have done yet. The delta is perfect to the second. And there is no ambiguity between the Q statement and the result. Itās a word for word, second for second proof.
This absolutely cannot be a coincidence. No way. How could it be?
What the fuck is going on here? This story gets more and more bizarre every month.
It successfully points out NFTs are weird to consider āvaluable assetsā to normies. Might be good considering that we know a lot of NTFs (and āartā) sales are just for laundering money, baiting fake news media to talk about Trump having an NFTs will drive attention and general knowledge about the subject to go up
Ok wtf.
I thought this was a boneheaded idea from a bad advisor.
But this is one the most clear proofs they have done yet. The delta is perfect to the second. And there is no ambiguity between the Q statement and the result. Itās a word for word, second for second proof.
This absolutely cannot be a coincidence. No way. How could it be?
What the fuck is going on here? This story gets more and more bizarre every month.
It better be coms, because normies are going to see this as grade A retardation.
It successfully points out NFTs are weird to consider āvaluable assetsā to normies. Might be good considering that we know a lot of NTFs (and āartā) sales are just for laundering money, baiting fake news media to talk about Trump having an NFTs will drive attention and general knowledge about the subject to go up
Maybe, thatās a bit of a stretch considering how surface level normies are, but you have to start somewhere.