Robert Kennedy Confirming John Jr Again?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
The rebuke of germ theory and the existence of viruses is a tough sell for a lot of people, even for those with access to the information.
Your personal speculation isn’t convincing enough for me.
You need to realise he is one of the elite and they have access to the truth of everything....
And
Putting that aside..he could not be in the position he is in and not know.
I Know and I am not privy to any private knowledge..or swim in the rivers he swims in!!! He is in that environment all day
Oh ya? Were his uncle and father members of the cabal?
Your claim is purely conjecture based on what you assume he should know. I don’t even wholly subscribe to your beliefs about viruses, and I’ve spend a great deal of time looking into it.
Besides, it’s not an effective strategy for red pulling normies. It’s a bridge too far for most people, and would ruin the chances of reaching the majority of people if he put too much emphasis on that particular belief.
Still, I don’t see any evidence of him being deceptive about that subject, and, short of any evidence to the contrary, could easily be chocked up to ignorance.
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?r=8cSGjqEoyncQGynLZgG9WAbC61LaBPpT
This is easy to understand. It has been known at least since 1918 and the so called Spanish flu that germ theory..note ..theory..was scientifically proven to be totally wrong. It has been a scam that the cabal have used on people to depopulate maim and make trillions from ever since.
There is no way Robert Kennedy doesn't know the truth.
So you watched a documentary that convinced you. Are you positive that there aren’t any holes in that logic?
Besides that, you’ve made nothing but assertions, claiming that just because you believe something to be true, that automatically anyone else with acces to that same information has to believe it to be true.
You’ve based your argument here or very shaky logic, and I would encourage you to do better in the future.