Does she infer it is not a criminal act and just a sexual identity?

This topic is very convoluted and difficult to argue. Put a apostrophe in the wrong spot or use the wrong pronoun and you get all sorts of detractors.

Grooming, brainwashing of children, is there a law against it? Obviously its not illegal, they allow it to happen. Is it good for young minds? No, it is not. They have found a niche they can exploit. Because nobody thought it necessary to pass a bill making it illegal to dress up like a Frankenstein fairy princess with your dick hanging out and parade in front of children.

Like I said, she should have been more precise with her words, she would have avoided all the scrutiny. We know what see was thinking without saying it.

If she was smart, she would have said, "We need to get these groomers out of our schools".

She didn't do that, instead she is defending the groomers, attacking the label we placed on the pedophiles.

You can defend you if you like but I highly doubt you will convince any of us that she has the best interest of the people being abused by the groomers, in mind.