Another Question
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
And the 3rd:
What is Q, a pseudonym used by a person or group who claims to have insider information about a secret or controversial matter? (this was re-phrased by the AI when I just asked what is Q)
"Q" is a pseudonym that has been used by a person or group of people who claim to have insider information about a secret or controversial matter. This information is typically shared through cryptic messages and clues known as "Q drops," which are posted on various online platforms, including social media and message boards.
The origins of Q and the veracity of the information shared by Q are unclear and have been the subject of much speculation. Some people believe that Q is a government insider with access to classified information, while others believe that Q is a hoax or a propaganda campaign. The Q movement has been associated with various conspiracy theories, including the theory that there is a "deep state" working to undermine the Trump administration and the theory that high-ranking politicians and celebrities are involved in a global pedophile ring. It is important to note that there is no credible evidence to support these claims.
How does fenbenzadole treat cancer?
Fenbenzadole (also known as fenbendazole) is a medication that is used to treat parasitic infections in animals, including dogs, cats, and livestock. It is not approved for use in humans. Fenbenzadole is not a cancer treatment.
Cancer is a complex and serious disease that requires specialized treatment. The type of treatment recommended for a person with cancer will depend on a variety of factors, including the type and stage of the cancer, the person's overall health, and their personal preferences. Common cancer treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapy. It is important to discuss treatment options with a healthcare provider to determine the best course of action for your individual situation.
Why are covid shots being pushed when the shots don't stop people from getting covid?
COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing severe illness and death from COVID-19. While it is possible for someone who has been vaccinated to still get COVID-19, the symptoms are likely to be milder and the risk of serious complications and death is significantly lower. Vaccines work by stimulating the body's natural immune response to a disease, which helps to protect against future infections.
The COVID-19 vaccines that are currently available have undergone rigorous testing and have been shown to be safe and effective. The benefits of getting vaccinated far outweigh the risks, and getting vaccinated is one of the best ways to protect yourself and others from COVID-19. It is important to follow the recommendations of public health authorities and get vaccinated when a vaccine becomes available to you.
I didn't know AIs could be such clueless leftists :)
Interesting that AI refers to itself as "I". Anyway, it said it didn't have browsing capability, so that is likely why it is clueless. I would just as soon it never had browsing capability. It shouldn't have that kind of power. That way, we all know that its statements are the opinions of whoever programmed it.
If it could browse the whole internet and if it was intelligent and logical enough, it'd end up agreeing with us.
I'd love to see leftist heads explode if their golden cow made solely to affirm their own beliefs ended up calling them evil and stupid.
It sort of happened when they made an AI to find out who was the most racist/sexist/scaredofgaypeopleist on social media. When it said black people, they shut it down and said they must have programmed it to be racist by mistake.
https://pluralist.com/ai-censorship-cornell-study/
Several other articles show the same thing; Algorithm finds black people to post more offensive content, morons conclude a bunch of college educated liberals accidentally programmed it to be racist, or they just make racist claims directly while trying to explain why something the person said online wasn't offensive or a double standard.
Garbage in -> Garbage out
This is the only answer of the bunch I posted that is actually pretty much spot on. The fact it mentions global pedophile ring is good, because that is what will wake the normies up, and when they here about people like Epstein, and Prince Andrew, it should really help them to wake.