If Elon steps down tomorrow, then Q will have called his entire stint at Twitter. Just sayin'
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Not exactly a prisoner swap.
When you inherit a kingdom, you also inherit that kingdom's sins.
Every king will understand this.
Elon became king of Twitter, but it was not a throne which one could seize. A king is always held down by the cabal of misfits behind him who hold a dagger to him and his progeny. He must appease the people as well as these cutthroats who disguise themselves as yes-men.
On paper, Elon bought Twitter. In reality, he bought a writ of slave ownership. The hidden masters will have not given up "their" kingdom on the arrival of a "peoples" king.
Twitter is the pre-eminent platform for the trade of child pornography, as we have come to find out. Saudi Arabia, the Bloody Wonderland, was the height of sex trafficking, so Q informs us.
Do you see it?
Twitter is the Bloody Wonderland's access portal. Always has been. A messenger bird for the merchants of death and depravity.
If Elon steps down, it means his job was done. He acted as a company liquidator. He seized the assets, and catalogued all the strings of the puppet masters. He's the messenger and in-between man for what is ostensibly the collapse and bankruptcy of a human trafficking empire, unable to survive now that their marketplace portal has been shut down.
Why Elon? Because he had the capital to make it work, and the infrastructure to support the take-down. White Hats held him hostage, and used him as a means by which to contact the real hostage-takers -- traffickers.
Elon controls Twitter as the CEO. These assholes are the controllers of the controller. Once strings connected to these parasites are cut, Twitter, the bird, will sing.
That's how I see it, anyways.
Wow, thanks for spelling it out for myself and others. Comments like this is why I'm here.
You see, that's the thing. They have to fight a war while maintaining appearances. The market can't know Twitter's not for sale. They can't know it, as well as Facebook, have always been a Government entity under the pretense of a privately/not-so-privately owned company.
You're forgetting all that time Elon fought to acquire Twitter. Personally, I see that as them buying time to cut all the strings they know would lead back to them. Then when Elon finally gets it, he has to see where they missed a thread or two.
He had to be allowed to buy it, otherwise all other companies get revealed as being owned by a shadow-network of government spy agencies.
They're also fighting on two fronts. Salman (Alwaleed's successor) isn't playing nice with his brother's associates as well. They had retreated to Twitter for shelter. Elon marked the beginning of their "safe spaces" finally being assaulted.
https://qalerts.app/?n=29
There's lots of moving parts, so I'm just feeling my way through this. But in light of a lot of Q posts, it makes sense that Twitter was a crown jewel for The Bloody Wonderland in their operational procedures.
https://qalerts.app/?n=896
Something tells me Elon was able to buy because they couldn't continue paying the bills for their global messenger racket.
It's like a board of Go.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(game)
Some assets flip, white to black, but ultimately it's clear that even if a piece presents as black or white right now, the turn order ensures it's final allegiance at the end of the game.
Right now, I think Twitter was safely owned by Black Hats up until the end of the 2020 election. At that point, different aspects of the company were up for grabs, and a scramble ensued between black hats and white hats to grab up as much of the bird as they could before the bell rang.
Elon, in my opinion, is a white hat asset which was flipped white. He is currently acting like a white piece, but can change back to black at a whim. He's a pivot point for this war, and a contact for both parties to communicate what turns they are making in this tit-for-tat game.
Elon, I'm sure, knows the white hats have an upper hand seeing how the black hats don't have Alwaleed backing them anymore. They still have an empire which has a controlling stake in world commerce, however, regardless of whether or not it's illegal. Big players are involved in the trafficking market, and if they were to go down so, too would their investments. Taking out the trafficking market will also nail the entire global economy along with it.
It's not as easy as flipping the light switch on and off.
Part of why these entrenched players are so protected is because they know if they are arrested it's not just them who will go broke. Our market is actually built on foundation blocks of illicit activity. They know that's the only way to get away with it. It's the "too big to fail" mentality/mantra.
Elon is acting like the jack which holds up the crossbeams so that the foundation blocks can be swapped out. Elon is temporary, and necessarily has to cooperate with the previous, rotting foundation for a time so that they don't take the whole house down with them as they get ripped out.
White Hats seized Twitter and Elon was installed. Where the funding came from and whether or not Elon was once a black hat or has been a white hat or whatever is anyones guess. But, with the Twitter files being released it seems logical to conclude that White Hats are in control of Twitter.
"muh optics"
That's apparently why.
Which brings this back around to Q posts: when does the BIRD SING?
https://qagg.news/?read=153