he admitted that the legally required chain of custody was not followed at any point in this last election.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I would think for such a prominent and historic trial they would have pulled out the really big legal guns. Weird!
After watching that cross, I cannot believe how TERRIBLE Lake's lawyers are.
Leading questions, hostile questions, so many reasons to object to easily half of the questions asked, and they just sat around twiddling their thumbs.
They had better have a LOT more hard evidence, because the legal team might as well not be present.
The problem is that the really big conservative legal guns wont touch anything election related. Cowardice is a huge problem for our side.
that could also be due to a law that prevents republicans from questioning the outcome of elections
Well, it's certainly not unreasonable. Risking your entire career and livelihood needed to support a family, or just repay loans needed to get a law degree is not an easy choice to make.
I guess I'm glad someone is willing to do it, but worried they may greatly hurt the case either from ignorance or malice.