So, the alternative is throwing us to the wolves and letting the cabal have their way with us? That's a surefire way to prevent civil war, riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Taking the occasional pennyante potshot at these creeps and pretending it's some sort of crushing blow means nothing.
Maybe a civil war might be somewhat of a good thing? I know, I know: saying that in these environs is completely verboten--but isn't it better to go down fighting with honor than to sit around and wait for the enemy to come round you up and slaughter you?
That's exactly what our side is doing, despite all the "you have to go out and get involved on the local level!" rhetoric. Even if everyone here "got involved at the local level" and got in city councils, on school boards, sheriff's offices, etc. (And to be honest, not everyone has the gift of gab or the resources to run for political office, even at the local level), sooner or later we will still need some major power and muscle to come back us up (i.e. so called patriots in power)! Why is saying this so verboten?
Because, in my experience, people who say "boogaloo now" tend to ABSOLUTELY NOT have our best interests at heart. They all tend to be:
1.) Glowing Fed-Boys who are looking for a patriot to capture, parade around like a trophy, and then either make the patriot turn traitor or dead,
2.) Tyrannical forces who wants to take advantage of the chaos to enslave, rape, and murder to their sickened-hearts content with little repercussion,
3.) Overly-emotional pussies who don't know the horrors of war, don't know what they wish for when they wish for a chaotic civil war, and likely will cower at the first instance of real battle,
4.) Keyboard-Warriors Couch-Potatoes who talk tough behind a computer screen but wants to have others do their dirty work so they don't have to leave their cave and expose themselves as frauds, or
5.) Black-pilled casualties-of-a-psychological-war who have been made invalids due to their state of minds and really need to step back and have a vacation.
If Civil War is such a good idea, then why Donald Trump does not advocate for it? Why Ron DeSantis does not advocate for it? Why Mike Lindell does not advocate for it? Why Kari Lake does not advocate for it? Why MTG and Boebert does not advocate for it? Why Q (to my knowledge) does not advocate for it? Why practically every reputable MAGA personality and VIPs, both online and offline, does not advocate for it?
Demands for civil war is total Fed / Khaki Pants bullshit. The only people who want us to be violent is the government so they can put in place tyrannical measures against the citizen population. Look how great the Jan 6th folks are being treated. No thanks. Be smarter than the boogaloo.
So, the alternative is throwing us to the wolves and letting the cabal have their way with us? That's a surefire way to prevent civil war, riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Taking the occasional pennyante potshot at these creeps and pretending it's some sort of crushing blow means nothing.
Maybe a civil war might be somewhat of a good thing? I know, I know: saying that in these environs is completely verboten--but isn't it better to go down fighting with honor than to sit around and wait for the enemy to come round you up and slaughter you?
That's exactly what our side is doing, despite all the "you have to go out and get involved on the local level!" rhetoric. Even if everyone here "got involved at the local level" and got in city councils, on school boards, sheriff's offices, etc. (And to be honest, not everyone has the gift of gab or the resources to run for political office, even at the local level), sooner or later we will still need some major power and muscle to come back us up (i.e. so called patriots in power)! Why is saying this so verboten?
Because, in my experience, people who say "boogaloo now" tend to ABSOLUTELY NOT have our best interests at heart. They all tend to be:
1.) Glowing Fed-Boys who are looking for a patriot to capture, parade around like a trophy, and then either make the patriot turn traitor or dead,
2.) Tyrannical forces who wants to take advantage of the chaos to enslave, rape, and murder to their sickened-hearts content with little repercussion,
3.) Overly-emotional pussies who don't know the horrors of war, don't know what they wish for when they wish for a chaotic civil war, and likely will cower at the first instance of real battle,
4.) Keyboard-Warriors Couch-Potatoes who talk tough behind a computer screen but wants to have others do their dirty work so they don't have to leave their cave and expose themselves as frauds, or
5.) Black-pilled casualties-of-a-psychological-war who have been made invalids due to their state of minds and really need to step back and have a vacation.
If Civil War is such a good idea, then why Donald Trump does not advocate for it? Why Ron DeSantis does not advocate for it? Why Mike Lindell does not advocate for it? Why Kari Lake does not advocate for it? Why MTG and Boebert does not advocate for it? Why Q (to my knowledge) does not advocate for it? Why practically every reputable MAGA personality and VIPs, both online and offline, does not advocate for it?
Couldn't agree more!
Demands for civil war is total Fed / Khaki Pants bullshit. The only people who want us to be violent is the government so they can put in place tyrannical measures against the citizen population. Look how great the Jan 6th folks are being treated. No thanks. Be smarter than the boogaloo.