Ah, the old Paytriot shillism. That cry has been used by more shills than not. An easy inroad for creating division.
And in typical GAW fashion, opinions were made, stones were cast, and so on.
I won't say if that is typical or not, but obviously, if there is an argument to be made it should be made using empirical data, reasoning, logic and balance. More often than not, such assertions tend to come from extremely emotionally driven places, NOT from based, balanced and reasoned arguments.
Yeah, I just checked back into this thread, and you can see what I mean lol.
Either Patel could be a grifter/paytriot, and either could be legit. Either way, I'm not spending money. I'll spend money on the one who is right in the end, if at all.
I cannot see anything wrong with choosing to use or apply your money where you want. Either way.
So I also don't see anything wrong with people who invest time, money, effort receiving support or creating ways to sustain that work or make a living, either.
I do put money to some places, but I get about 100 times more value from those places than value I put in. As a culture, we seem to have become trained in the "I deserve everything for free" mentality.
The thing is, these people (like PP) actually DO put out a lot of value without demanding (selling) it. They offer it freely, then ask, hey, if you want to support, I can use that support, and here's how to do it.
If we want to look at real grifters, we should look at places like this: this is what real grifting looks like: scam central.
Ah, the old Paytriot shillism. That cry has been used by more shills than not. An easy inroad for creating division.
And in typical GAW fashion, opinions were made, stones were cast, and so on.
I won't say if that is typical or not, but obviously, if there is an argument to be made it should be made using empirical data, reasoning, logic and balance. More often than not, such assertions tend to come from extremely emotionally driven places, NOT from based, balanced and reasoned arguments.
More often than not.
PS thanks for the response!
Yeah, I just checked back into this thread, and you can see what I mean lol.
Either Patel could be a grifter/paytriot, and either could be legit. Either way, I'm not spending money. I'll spend money on the one who is right in the end, if at all.
I cannot see anything wrong with choosing to use or apply your money where you want. Either way.
So I also don't see anything wrong with people who invest time, money, effort receiving support or creating ways to sustain that work or make a living, either.
I do put money to some places, but I get about 100 times more value from those places than value I put in. As a culture, we seem to have become trained in the "I deserve everything for free" mentality.
The thing is, these people (like PP) actually DO put out a lot of value without demanding (selling) it. They offer it freely, then ask, hey, if you want to support, I can use that support, and here's how to do it.
If we want to look at real grifters, we should look at places like this: this is what real grifting looks like: scam central.
https://amg-news.com/cia-top-secret-list-of-8-million-names-who-will-be-rounded-up-when-martial-law-is-imposed-video/
I agree, I'm just saying I'm not as concerned with people trying to make a buck because I'm not losing money if it turns out they are fake.