The same, only slower.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
How soon? Any time frame on that one, or is it maybe just bullshit to keep you complacent? Metaphors are a distraction from actual discussion.
No, it would be stupid as fuck to take a mostly complacent population who had no idea how bad things were, and tell them a bunch of shit on how bad things were just to hopefully make them more complacent when you tell them there's a plan.
And if that's the case, Trump is in on their plan, which itself is a silly idea. They don't attack any of their controlled opposition as hard as they attack Trump and his followers. Trump also gave space to true conservatives and America first people. Why do this when they already had their perfect little two party system with the Dems and the RINOs?
So I think we can reasonably establish that it's not controlled by the bad guys. At that point, we only have to establish whether or not it's true. I think this is also well established, and as such the fact nobody knows the exact timeframe is mostly irrelevant.
It is meant to keep a civil war from happening, though. The good guys in control who are trying to fix shit peacefully first seem to be opposed to bloodshed, you know, as a result of them being the good guys.
Obvious misrepresentation. The population is noticing how bad things are getting, have been for a while. Telling them they're actually secretly winning plays on their hopes even though nothing has improved.
No it isn't. The fact you and everyone else here takes it for granted that he's on your side is exactly why it's worth it to have him as controlled opposition. You trust politicians. That's why it works. It's crazy that so many people still buy into the uniparty scam.
They barely attack Trump. He was banned on twitter...wow, me too. They say bad things about him. Scary. Meanwhile, his followers who "stormed the capitol," who he betrayed, rot in solitary with no trial. That's because they actually hate his followers, even if they are misled.
We can? You can't even tell me who your saviors are. Prove it
It's highly relevant. If I wanted my enemies to think they were winning, i would want them to believe in no one in particular and have no time frame. That way it can't be falsified. Saved by someone, sometime, who knows.
Wouldn't want to take the worst evil on the planet seriously, I guess. Good guys would just take over. If they were "in control," they wouldn't have to kill a bunch of people, due to already being in control. None of it makes any sense.
Noticing being the operative word. Nobody knew anything back then, so the timing is stupid. Most people still have absolutely no clue about any of this, and many who do call it a conspiracy theory. All they did was wake us up.
This operation trust narrative is a pile of bullshit. If they wanted controlled OP, it would be solely focused on people in the public sphere telling us all this shit, instead of some random called Q on a forum that hardly anyone actually gives a shit about or listens to.
And it's clear Trump is on our side. At least well enough to reasonably take it as truth. Trump is very clearly not in their party, as you have both sides of the ACTUAL uniparty attacking him and calling him an evil racist who no one should follow. Calling him a bad representation of conservatism. Calling him the death of the Republican Party. They also constantly have hunted him with lawsuits and witch hunts for 6 years. Or did you miss that? He only survives because they have nothing. Because he's squeaky clean. Because he's protected by the military. Otherwise, they would have done him in with their cabal blackmail they have on all their assets in the 2020 election to seal the deal. They didn't, because they can't. Trump is not a politician either. Maybe the worst take in your whole post.
Jesus Christ is the only savior. Until then, it's plausible that the military has a plan in place to temporality beat back the evil. It makes plenty of sense if you open yourself to hope and close yourself to doom and despair. But it's ok, it's a defense mechanism. Can't accept hope because it would destroy you to be wrong again. Demoralized and apathetic, just like they want you to be.
I don't know when Jesus is coming back, either. Still going to happen, and that isn't Satan's lie, it's God's promise. While these aren't the exact same, the point is that your point sucks. There's a dozen reasons for doing it like this, yours is but one.
Also, patriots in control doesn't mean they have full and total control of everything that happens. But to compare it to chess, at a certain point you win no matter what. It just becomes a matter of playing the finishing moves. Both sides know it, but neither wants to say it. Doesn't mean the winning side broadcasts their exact play for the other side.
But they definitely would want to do it in such a way that the brainwashed masses revolt and start a civil war, leading to the mass deaths of potentially millions of Americans in a bloody fight between neighbors, right?
And again, patriots in control doesn't necessarily mean what some around here like to interpret it as meaning.
They also need to all get taken out at once, or they'll just regroup in the shadows and start over. This is about freedom from a 1000s year evil, not just taking one country back for a little bit and playing the endless game of tug of war we've been stuck in.
But you know what? Yes, your theory is possible. Doesn't mean it's true, though. And if you had a shred of intellectual honesty, you'd acknowledge the possibility of truth in the theories presented here as well.
I love this thread. Because I love this debate. The "Two Paths" phenomenon.
"One of our analogies is correct. Hopefully we find out soon which one."
This.
And Infidel makes a valid point as well.
But time is somewhat* irrelevant here. Society IS holding together, somehow. Until society actually begins to crumble then I have 100% faith in the Plan.
If shit goes sideways and there's no sign of intervention from ANY aspect of our government? (As is currently happening in slow motion) Then I will start to worry a bit.
The notion that The Plan = Complacency is grounded in circular logic. The individual making this claim is also guilty of complacency. The act of calling out complacency while remaining complacent is like criticizing OJ Simpson's verdict while stabbing someone.
If complacency is the biggest hurdle, last I checked, P.Win is much larger than GA.Win... so how is this a Q/Plan issue?