Even though they proved chain of custody was non existent, they didn't prove the assholes DID anything with the shredded chain of custody. It's retarded, really. WHY ELSE FUCK UP CHAIN OF CUSTODY IF YOUR AREN'T CHEATING? It's like arresting someone for DUI and their defense is, "Can you prove I killed anyone?" Corrupt as hell, all of them.
Proof is absolutely meaningless without enforcement and accountability. We can prove this and that until we're blue in the face. Means nothing if there's no justice.
IT IS! I said that long ago! Got many times banned in the meantime up until now. I probably will again because I'm questioning the reality of all of these claims of election fraud proof. You'd think they'd show us even if they fail in court, but they don't even have proof to show the courts! I know the courts are corrupt but these people are falling FAR short of their wild claims!
The judge only focused on proving misconduct for 16-672(a)1. I dunno, maybe changing settings the morning of in 132 most republican area? Nah, that was a big whoopsie.
This is bullshit, plain and simple. They absolutely proved chain of custody was broken yet determine nothing was proven?
Even though they proved chain of custody was non existent, they didn't prove the assholes DID anything with the shredded chain of custody. It's retarded, really. WHY ELSE FUCK UP CHAIN OF CUSTODY IF YOUR AREN'T CHEATING? It's like arresting someone for DUI and their defense is, "Can you prove I killed anyone?" Corrupt as hell, all of them.
Proof is absolutely meaningless without enforcement and accountability. We can prove this and that until we're blue in the face. Means nothing if there's no justice.
IT IS! I said that long ago! Got many times banned in the meantime up until now. I probably will again because I'm questioning the reality of all of these claims of election fraud proof. You'd think they'd show us even if they fail in court, but they don't even have proof to show the courts! I know the courts are corrupt but these people are falling FAR short of their wild claims!
What was deleted? I didn't get a chance to read it.
The judge only focused on proving misconduct for 16-672(a)1. I dunno, maybe changing settings the morning of in 132 most republican area? Nah, that was a big whoopsie.
https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/2020/title-16/section-16-672/