Installment two - on muh unicorn viruses!!

The latest alt-truthers to bore me to tears are the No Virus people

He's bored eh? He enjoys believing in, and FEARING boogeymen that have clearly never been demonstrated to exist. That does lead to a less boring life I suppose. Let's see how LITTLE he understands about the "No Virus people"!

Their obnoxious rise is fully understandable, given the matrix of deception that has accompanied the Coronavirus power grab, and at a certain level I’m sympathetic to them, as I am to all alt-truth adherents

Ah, we're "obnoxious" huh? Us trying to spread the truth is "obnoxious" to him. What a wonderful perspective. Our world was only turned upside down by the big virus lie, no biggie there. Just a minor nuisance is all. Un-effin-real!

Humans are simple primates for the most part.

Spoken like a true brainwashed materialist whose fully brainwashed by his indoctrination edumcation. Speak for yourself pal. I'm much more than a "simple primate". That's merely a suit I wear for a brief period of time.

Our lazy brains prefer easy heuristics to laborious reasoning.

Once again, speak for yourself. This collective attitude smells a whole lot like communism/marxism/socialism to me. Could that be why he fails to understand rational discussion?

As applied to the narratives advanced by knowledge authorities, there are only really two rules of thumb that can be consistently applied: believe everything, or believe nothing.

Another "appeal to authority logical fallacy". Who are these "knowledge authorities" he speaks of? Are we forced to agree with them because he says so?

When you’ve been lied to repeatedly throughout your entire life, defaulting to ‘believe nothing’ isn’t necessarily the worst bet to make.

He doesn't realize what he's saying, but I happen to agree with what he's saying --- that he doesn't REALIZE. Because it is BELIEFS that get us into trouble, like the belief in muh unicorn viruses as one tiny example...

Still, No Virus strikes me as absurd.

Can you explain why? Have you ever seen a virus? If not, why then is it so absurd?

I don’t doubt that terrain theory contains important insights into how malnutrition, inflammation, chronic fatigue, and so on, can leave one’s biology dangerously compromised.

This is where I make everybody angry as "terrain theory" is also an unproven falsehood. Both germ and terrain theory are incorrect. And that's why they're both still called THEORIES...no facts!!

What it can’t explain is the infectious spread of contagious disease.

Correct. But neither can "Germ theory". There's not a single scientific experiment that demonstrates "infectious spread of contagious disease",,,because that's not what's happening in the first place!!

How exactly does terrain theory explain Mesoamerican civilization getting wiped out within years of contact with the Spanish?

Uh yeah, it's called brute force genocide. Ever consider that as a possibility?

Further, none of it explains why the smallpox symptoms that swept away the Indian population were entirely novel to them, and entirely familiar to their European friends.

Yet another establishment cabal lie he BELIEVES. Nothing of the sort happened. See the "Island of Misfit Viruses" series from the Anti-Virus-Leauge from AshlandDog posts for the full explanation.

The primary emotional motivation driving No Virus, at least according to its evangelists, is that their gospel is a killshot against medical tyranny.

WTF? This guy is now going to tell me and my cohorts why we do what we do, due to our "emotional motiviation"? Who does this guy think he is? Freud the fraud? What ever happened to seeking the truth for truth's sake? Nah, that couldn't be it from these crazy "no virus people". We only operate according to our "emotional motivation" to evangelize. Well ya just can't argue with that! And here I thought I was just interested in getting to the truth of the matter...silly me.

If viruses don’t exist, you see, a biosecurity state predicated on protecting us from viruses is dead on arrival. This strikes me as sort of true but largely irrelevant.

Ah right, the last 3 years have been LARGELY IRRELEVANT to this guy, and he speaks for all of us, right? Lockdowns, closed businesses, forced masks on babies and children, mandated jabs, blocked airline travel, corporate mandates. All irrelevant folks, just move along as the good slaves that you are. SMH...

If the technocracy wants a biosecurity state, they’ll do whatever they can to get one, and they’ll use whatever excuse they need to.

They already did it? Is this guy perhaps braindead?

If they accepted the notion that viruses don’t exist, they’d find another boogieman.

The virus is about as good as it's gonna get for them. Something nobody can see, nobody can prove exists but that we all should BELIEVE does according to our "blind trust in authority" edumacation programs we're supposed to be running.

Terrain theory enables them to reduce you to ‘mere life’ as easily – perhaps more easily – than a virus.

This is another strawman logical fallacy. He's directing the reader to agree that if it's not viruses, it must be terrain theory. Both of which are untrue. Where does that leave the reader?

In any case, what I find most tiresome about No Virus is, again, its lack of imagination.

Whatever do you mean?

Instead of just running with ‘viruses don’t exist’, a statement in which holes can be very easily poked upon confrontation with very basic observations,

Which holes? Which "basic observation" can he make? Reading a paper from establishment pseudoscientific virologists? Words on paper? He doesn't have an argument and this is why he doesn't make one. Because he CAN'T!

What if that’s not the case, and viruses are actually symbiotic entities whose existence is inextricably interwoven with the healthy function of all life-forms?

Well for the first time he's on the right track. But his arguments fail due to the initial "belief in viruses". First you must demonstrate viruses exist. He of course fails to do this, and just assumes his readers will all go along with him.

Over the last several years, we’ve learned that a very large part of the human genome – and the genomes of every other species – are viral in origin.

Utter poppycock nonsense. We've learned no such thing. What a ludicrous statement.

Viruses routinely splice new genes into our cells; indeed, they seem to be designed to do exactly this.

And more nonsense. You and the virologists have yet to prove muh unicorn viruses exist yet, and now these mythical creatures are "splicing genes"? How does he get from here to there? He doesn't. He just read some words he believes and then says so.

What if this isn’t all just random and accidental, but in some sense intentional and planned? Viruses in this case would serve as a genetic reservoir, a collective extrasomatic genome, a means by which the biosphere genetically engineers its elements in accordance with whatever aims it might have. In this understanding, viruses are an absolutely essential element of evolutionary development:

He's now talking about Microzyma/Somatids. He clearly hasn't done anywhere near enough research to know what these are and I don't have the space to explain them in detail. Suffice it to say, these are the building blocks of all life and in a way, do what he's saying. But they're not viruses!!! You can think of them as stem cells for easy comprehension. Check out how the lives of Royal Rife and Gaston Naessans were destroyed by the medical and legal authorities so that their dark field microscopes wouldn't become common-place thus leaving the microbial world ripe for deceptive fairytales.

A similar perceptual shift has already taken place with regard to the microbiome: rather than see bacteria as dangerous little nasties deserving to be nuked with antibiotics, we now understand that ‘our’ bodies are really hothouse ecologies consisting of a symbiotic web encompassing cells containing ‘our’ DNA, along with a teeming mass of commensal prokaryotes without which our digestive systems would not function.

He's round-aboutly correct in this paragraph. There's no such thing as "harmful" bacteria. Our bodies create bacteria, which morph from the microzyma/somatid to perform valuable tasks within our body.

Note that medical tyranny based on virus fearmongering is just as inhibited by this narrative, as by the No Virus narrative ... but with the advantage that the viral symbiote framing doesn’t require vast amounts of well-established biology to be chucked out, and in fact is arguably more consistent with everything else that has been learned about genomes and evolution since viruses were first discovered.

This is more strawmanning rhetoric. He's now saying we SHOULD believe in viruses because, well, it could be good for us. His failure to understand things is based on this; while the establishment medical cabal is 100% reliant on a "narrative", the "no virus people" aren't selling a "NARRATIVE". We offer only the truth, which is self-evident, requiring no "narrative" to propagate.

The theme running through these three disparate critiques of uninspired alt-truth is this: instead of advocating for alt-realities that chop away at what’s known and leave nothing in their place,

The author's fundamental inability to comprehend these topics is that we he christens as "KNOWN" are actually GIGANTIC LIES. What he thinks he "knows" is actually a bunch of lies he **BELIEVES""!!!

the Moon Landing Hoax, Flat Earth, No Virus – are fundamentally reactionary. They are not really alternative understandings of reality, but sterile denials of reality, and as such they have nowhere to go ... and have no real power against the spell that has been woven by the sorcerers of globalism.

I actually can't think of any better TRUTHS to break the spell of a lifetime of indoctrination and humanity's incessant need to have "blind trust in authority". This is the author's blind spot through and through. He's a "BELIEVER OF LIES" but doesn't realize it....yet.

Look not for narratives that close off possibilities, that leave you trapped in a flattened world where nothing ever happens

And one last dig at the flat-earthers for good measure eh? H would like you to believe, as he apparently does, that realizing flat earth forces you into a world where "nothing ever happens"...which is the exact POLAR OPPOSITE of what Flat-Earthers believe and are espousing.

Instead of rejecting the known

Which is PRECISELY what the author is doing by rejecting his own common sense, in favor of his "blind trust in authority".

Simple negation is static paralysis. One must find something else to say Yes to.

This is the battle cry of the globe-earth defenders. They are so lost in their mental abstractions and models that they refuse to accept the ACTUAL TRUTH because a bunch of independent researchers haven't yet assembled a brand new mental model abstraction (that took decades and trillions of dollars to invent) they can replace it with.

My advice to the author, it's okay to not know everything. Knowing that you've been lied to on a massive scale is at first angering, then depressing, but eventually it's most liberating when you come back to your own God-given senses and realize this realm we live in is a fantastically beautiful and mysterious place, unexplained by scientism and the ostensible experts.

And for those still unswayed by my remarks. I'd like to make it perfectly clear that it is the ESTABLISHMENT that is MAKING CLAIMS, not me/us. We have evaluated their claims on the globe earth and on viruses. And not a single one of them is true. That's our only "claim". That we know we've been lied to.

Onward and upward!