Your Alt-Reality Is Boring......A plea for more interesting alt-realities than the Moon Landing Hoax, Flat Earth, and No Virus.
(barsoom.substack.com)
** THERE WILL BE A QUIZ **
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (257)
sorted by:
I found the virus discussion interesting, as well as the premise of the article as described in the final paragraphs.
It is interesting when you look through the original debates when Pasteur was first presenting germ theory.
Of course, the terrain theory would have precluded the profitability of Rockefeller funded medical system that we know and love today. (Of course the link dumbs it down to "viruses aren't real" when it's something closer to viruses are created within the body when conditions of the terrain require it to prevent greater damage, and not something that attacks the body)
Each of those topics do have some serious scientifically minded discussion behind them, and while I agree that it would only be used to better smear the group and should be kept to "conspiracies.win" (as mods have recommended), the dismissal and calling it "boring" to denigrate the topics themselves, IMO at least, is a demonstration of how we have been indoctrinated on those beliefs from a young age.
When the masters goal is to ensure everything you believe is a lie....i would say they were thorough.
'Member when queer theory was a theory that was really really weird?
No? Me neither.
I need to understand more about this. It resonates with my experiences but I've never heard of this.
Terrain?
...we work to give all concepts equal time....
And you're good at doing that.
...dogs were the original arbitrators of fairness...
...tinseled doggy winks...
...tinseled doggy winks...
With very sparkling eyes, no doubt.
...dogs were the original arbitrators of fairness...
As a side note, cats are the arbitrators of 'MINE, all MINE!' In fact, I have one on my lap right now insistently declaring that I'm all hers, and never mind that there are two other cats in the house...though sometimes she will share me with others...occasionally I have all three on my lap.
AND TAILS AWAGGIN'!!!!
Which part did you find interesting?
All of it, but that's more because it was interesting following the author's thinking. However, this particular paragraph is rather intriguing:
Reframing viruses as commensal genetic update vectors offering access to a vast and crucially important genetic repertoire would necessitate a change in how we saw our relationship, not just to viruses, but to the entire biosphere. Rather than something to insulate ourselves from, as something separate and other, it would lead naturally to an understanding of ourselves as an intrinsic, inextricable element of the biosphere. Our very genomes, which we’ve been accustomed to seeing as fixed from birth, become permeable, open to modification, fluidly connected to a genetic ocean. Evolution becomes not the outcome of a bloody war of attrition, but a collective adventure: evolutionary phase changes are something in which, in principle, an entire species can – and in general does – take part in together.
Well on a whole other level he's right, but that level has nothing to do with "viruses".
This is indeed the way the universe works. What he's talking about are microzymas/somatids which are the building blocks of "life". These are effectively "stem cells" in which all life arises from, including bacteria which arise from the microzyma/somatid in their many forms and shapes (17 to be exact... Q-incidence?).
And when spirit withdraws from the matter (body), it all decomposes back into these indestructible units of life which await their next opportunity to be infused with spirit to generate a new life form.
Thus, it is the microzyma/somatid which is the "essence of life", not the "cell". "Cells" are actually multiple cooperating microzyma/somatids, far from being the 'basic unit of life".
Thanks!
Thanks for the clarification!
WWG1WGA
Give me something to read please. I'm fascinated and this finally adds up to me.