We lose from both sides. This judge says the court must "assume the good faith of the election officials' conduct as a matter of law" "All reasonable presumptions must favor validity of elections." then case law is cited.
Yet the kangaroo sham of the January 6 "insurrection" must not consider any of the reasons the people were there, in DC, in the first place.
This country is turning into a Meme in its' entirety. It is such a shame. I do know that the hearing is not a courtroom and the committee itself is a sham, but here we always use the term optics and the January 6th investigation had plenty of optics (fraudulent, but plenty).
We lose from both sides. This judge says the court must "assume the good faith of the election officials' conduct as a matter of law" "All reasonable presumptions must favor validity of elections." then case law is cited. Yet the kangaroo sham of the January 6 "insurrection" must not consider any of the reasons the people were there, in DC, in the first place. This country is turning into a Meme in its' entirety. It is such a shame. I do know that the hearing is not a courtroom and the committee itself is a sham, but here we always use the term optics and the January 6th investigation had plenty of optics (fraudulent, but plenty).