I watched every minute of the trial and not once did the plaintiff lawyer implied intention wrong doing. What's the reason behind this?
What these lawyer did would be like proving a person stole a car, kidnapped a woman, beat her, raped her, put the murder weapon in the killer's hand, put them at the time and place, having the pic of the killer stabbing the woman, then having the defendant admit all of that to be true, but only to say "its really odd" the lady was murder in closing, and all that when the only thing the judge cares about is if murder was intentional or not.
What was the reason behind this legal tactic? Did they simply try to introduce evidence because everyone knew it would go to appeal?
It seems like maybe this has to get to the Supreme Court. Then it becomes a much bigger situation and maybe a bit more exposure. Then it could set a precedent for voting fraud other places.
The courts can only argue what is presented in court by the parties. The supreme court, the same. I think they expected and actually tried to lose. I think Kari Lake was a plant. She was all about supproting the trans movement before she was a governor candidate. I think we are all being played.
If she is secretly playing for the other team wouldn’t it have been much better to just have conceded rather than bring so much attention to voter fraud?
The left seems to fear her similar to how they feared Trump. Early on in her run they tried hard to corner her about accepting the outcome of the election just like they did with Trump.
A crucial aspect of judging a person’s political character is to analyze how the radical left reacts to them.
You certainly bring up a valid concern with the trans thing. I’ve heard this but have not researched it myself yet. As I am not from Arizona it has not been a priority for me to dig too deeply into her history and such.
Its called “running the clock out”. The court challenge gives false hopium to us. We think we have a chance and like lucy, they pull the ball when we try to kick. I read the complaint and found the evidence light and lacking. The judge dismissed 8/10 and kicked her to the curb after two days. Her lawyers were disorganized and amateurish. If they were serious, they would have the best lawyers in the nation drill down. The left has meticulously studied and orchestrated theft of the voting system nationwide and their multiple angled offenses, election timelines and court speed just don’t jive to successfully challenge doctorate level thievery. We need our game upped to the same level to win our country back. Down voting reality gets nowhere. Sorry.
The SC does a judicial review that puts federal law into focus rather than state law. In this case, if successful, the federal court has the ability to audit the state election systems since they have violated the constitution by suppressing rights and due process
You never know with everything going on...watching childhood cartoons from the 80s and it seems like it's the reverse of it. Cobra vs GI Joe yet Cobra seems to be getting the upper hand each time or MASK vs VENOM. Same thing.