Supreme Court Decision Pending In Little Known Case - The Great Awakening

Supreme Court Decision Pending In Little Known Case (www.supremecourt.gov)

posted 1 year ago by 2EyesOpen 1 year ago by 2EyesOpen +36 / -1

22 comments

22 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– 2EyesOpen [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Reality is.....it is an existing case.

The word 'hopium' is conjecture on your part. I might share in it. In fact I do for the most part.

I present it as news and news only.......to WATCH.....to comment on.....to gauge as positive or negative proof of progress.......

It's the reality we're living, not the one some dream of.

Don't project this dichotomy of hopium vs blackpilling onto the messenger.

I suggest no such thing.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– CQVFEFE 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

For the record I never entertained a thought of projecting a dichotomy of hopium vs blackpilling onto the messenger.

For one thing I don't believe "hopium vs. blackpilling" is a genuine, legit choice. A person can eschew hopium and red pills, yet remain neutral, not crossing over into blackpilling, if they are particularly good at keeping an open mind. (I'm not; I freely guzzle the hopium and red pills, even if their effects can wane somewhat on certain days LOL :)

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– 2EyesOpen [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Sounds to me like we agree.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– CQVFEFE 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'd say so

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q