DARPA document shows foreknowledge that the virus was made in a lab. We knew it!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Conspiracy Factualists
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
What is the source of this document?
Good question. Also, why does that "letterhead" appear to be typed rather than printed? And why is the 'letterhead' font exactly like the font in the rest of the letter? And is the date format correct for DARPA usage? It also seems a little too "pat" with all the bad moving parts right there in three paragraphs. Or is this supposed to be an executive summary, but not being labeled as such? Lots of questions on this.
Yes. It also confirms essentially everything we've been saying to the T. That's just not a realistic expectation. When every box is hit for basically every theory, it's cause for skepticism.
I don't want yes men, I want truth and honesty. When something is telling you what you want to hear, you should be willing to ask questions and break out a microscope. I need official sources for this supposedly official document.
PV is great, and has a lot of trust associated with them, but I want to make sure everything we have is done right when it comes to COVID because we need to stop it for the future.
Big problem, though...Name an "official source"' that can be trusted to provide "document"s that aren't BS.
It's a circular problem to be sure.
The best way is to have someone come out from within with the receipts, especially if they're willing to put themselves in danger (extremely rare) and expose who they are.
The next best way is to have them come out with receipts that can be directly matched and corroborated in some way, e.g. WikiLeaks gmail dumps.
Certainly though, we have run into some major issues with who we can trust and who we can share as sources.
has an artificial blur to the text too, im assuming to create a 'scanned' copy type look.
Maybe... maybe you're right about that, I don't know. Just raising some questions. But I still find the typed letterhead odd. They used to do that back in the 1950s and 60s, but nowadays every little sub-office in the government and military has printed letterhead paper. The only printed feature is the official seal in the upper left.
The word "UNCLASSIFIED" is also typed neatly above the letterhead. One would think that if it HAD been a classified document, the 'UNCLASSIFIED" would have been stamped or otherwise placed AFTER the original document had been printed.
And the font is an old fashioned serif font making me wonder if this was typed on a manual typewriter (rarely done today) or deliberately chosen as a computer font.
The fully justified text (equal margins on left and right) suggests that it's created on a computer, where that is a word processing function.
Questions, so many questions, about this document.
And what's with that 20th century typewriter font anyway?
Exactly. Even mid-century font to be honest.
WHICH document? Very Important...
...the one OP posted. Which other document could we be talking about?
Tango Yankee!!!!
?