People get banned around here so often for not even breaking sidebar rules that a handshake doesn’t mean anything anymore. And also sometimes yes, seeing something and wanting to comment on it is sometimes enough to make an account. That’s not unreasonable.
I insinuated that claiming it was or wasn’t, definitively, was absurd because no one on this board is qualified to make that statement. You’re so blinded by “being right” you can’t just admit that.
It’s you who can’t take the L lmfao. I only ever claimed we don’t really know. You’re telling me it’s absolutely impossible without proving anything’s
ITS YOUR L MY MAN. Basic logic and reasoning skills WOOSH right over your head.
“Massive problem in America” lmfao. Tell me you’ve never left your hometown without telling me you’ve never left your hometown. I can’t take people like this seriously. It’s a problem everywhere bud, the rest of the world is a sesspool.
Lmfao, you need to get your eyes checked. I never claimed time travel was possible. I was only pointing out there’s ZERO chance you or anyone else on this board is qualified enough to make the claim that it is or isn’t.
Again your hubris makes you look silly.
It’s interesting that you opened with a lecture about logic and reason, then followed it by an appeal to authority (“go read this one guy”) instead of actually addressing the argument.
Also, your invisible frog analogy doesn’t make the point you think it does. The burden of proof belongs to the person making the claim. If you claim there’s an invisible frog on your head, it’s not my job to disprove it—it’s your job to provide evidence that it’s there. That’s a basic principle of logic.
Ironically, you tell people to stop getting information from YouTube, then immediately recommend a YouTube personality as the authoritative source on metaphysics.
The simple fact is, you cannot prove if it is possible or not, either way. Your hubris is blinding. go touch grass, my friend.
Very.