So i've watched every McCullough, Korry, Cole, Malone, etc... interview and podcast. All of them say that the problem with the vaccine is that the vaccine is replicating the wrong part of the virus, the spike protein, which is causing all the blood clots. I understand all of that, but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65. If the problem with the spike is that it causes the blood clots, why would it be safe for people over 65? As you get older your body’s ability to create plasmin (the natural enzyme that breaks down blood clots) diminishes, while the ability and rate of creating clots increases. For a very long time, this idea of over 65 confused me. The only thing i can think of is hormones. Older people do not have hormones, like testosterone, like the young and healthy.. but older people still have a harder time creating plasmin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
If anybody tells me there's a safe way to pick up a rattlesnake I'm not sticking around long enough to learn the technique. If there's rattlesnakes around I'm getting the hell away from them. I'm not an expert. The people giving the lessons may or may not be experts - I don't know. But I've heard enough stories about people being bitten by rattlesnakes that I have developed a sense that makes me want to get away from them.
Yes, that's a great analogy.. but I just get frustrated when I hear the doctors that say don't get the jab but if your over 65 it's probably safe.. without saying why. That's all.
Well that's a pretty darn good analogy...