Rolling Stone posts panicked article about "QAnon", citing specific members here, due to connecting dots between Beatles, Crowley, Child Sacrifice, & the Tavistock Institute. In an effort to disprove us, they managed to do the opposite and just spread research to the normies. We Are The News Now.
(www.rollingstone.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (207)
sorted by:
That's my point. PAYtriots while seemingly good, are ultimately bad in most cases.
From misinfo to disinfo to outright MMM assets, they provide more harm than good.
Naturally, I 100% support capitalism.
However, once you create a product and sell it the primary goal is to what? Make money. Period. Anything else will come secondary if said product is your livilhood.
Nothing wrong with that. But... When we're talking about infotainment media, and the primary goal is monetary then the truth automatically becomes secondary, tertiary, or even more scaled back in priority.
The MSM gives drops of truth to the normies between all the lies. What would suggest that alt media pundits do otherwise? I'm against all forms of PAYtriot newe, it simply cant be trusted the same as any MSM outlet.
Among my other points about many of these PAYtriot alt media sources giving anons complete bunk like what's illustrated in the RS article or how several have been outed as MMM... Theres the whole human susceptibility to greed even if they are squeaky clean. So again, once these alt streamers monetise their production that's the primary reason they are doing it. The truth and research become secondary.
The whole argument of whether making money or not for producing content is a bit moot IMO. the ratio of ethically/morally good streamer vs corrupt/controlled bad streamer is insignificant. Do you check youe eggs before purchase? Do you purposefully choose to buy a dozen if even one is cracked or rotten?