Rolling Stone posts panicked article about "QAnon", citing specific members here, due to connecting dots between Beatles, Crowley, Child Sacrifice, & the Tavistock Institute. In an effort to disprove us, they managed to do the opposite and just spread research to the normies. We Are The News Now.
(www.rollingstone.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (207)
sorted by:
eye roll
Just another hit piece. The thing that gets me is, redditors come here from qult_hq and we straight up tell them this is wrong, yet they continue attacking us.
That said, I'm pretty sure I called these clowns out here a few weeks ago and was down voted as much as upvoted.
There really are some real people here who follow these clown ideas. If it weren't a slippery slope, I'd say a sticky of "stupid thoughts that we don't believe": JFK Jr alive, flat earth, Trump bucks, medbeds, etc and then the clowns who spread such propaganda.
I did that, and I think it even got stickied, and I also got some rebuttal.
I don't want to restrict open-mindedness and debate, but I want to make clear to journalists & normies that there are some specific ideas around here that are not officially from Q.
Someone on PDW tried to cite their disillusionment with Juan O' Savin as a reason why they abandoned Q. Once again it's that type of flawed thinking, connecting some 3rd party character to what we actually espouse.
When it comes to the more debatable topics, mods here do a good job of sticky-ing alternate takes for the sake of discussion.
...truth...
Couple this with the litany of times MSM rags have used Juan O Bullshittin as an example of "everything wrong with Q phenomenon" and I think it's safe to assume at this point in the timeline that Juan O is probably another MMM pundit. Especially given his track record of being 100% wrong on all accounts and "predictions."
At best a pay to play paytriot sophist. At worst a DS tool used against the greater research community.
IMHO, it's best to believe these pages are always infiltrated by enemy trolls.
Trump bucks? Do you mean NESARA/GESARA?
See above.... NESARA/GESARA ain't happening...I'll even tell Simon and Charley if I ever see them.
Well, for their own words, if you have ever studied SOCIALISM and Communism, and their Tenets, and then go and study NESARA/GESARA, you'll quickly see it's a blend of both....
Someone is selling NESARA/GESARA as being a better system than what we currently have, but it's just MORE of the same bullshit being pushed on us....
Lol, that is included, yes.
Was prolly a "setup" by clowns from the jump, from the "posters" to the Rolling Stoned author.
[Their] tentacles reach deep fake
People are just clinging to a fantasy that would be hilarious fun (JFK Jr) which is not the only fantasy people here have clung to.
I have definitely argued with a few silly flat earthers though. Medbeds are also popular.
Dunno about Trump bucks nonsense, but people do cling on NESARA.
It's always the same crowd here, spearheaded by at least one mod here. Which would be fine if it were contained to that demographic, however newbs find this crap stickied and may dive right into the paytriot traps.
Several of us anons have called this pattern of pushing/posting/shilling out fwiw. Don't be afraid to call out this nonsense when it rears its ugly head.
I am okay with limiting discussion to Q but it is disappointing how people even here turn into censoring, cruel authoritarians as soon as they reach the upper limit of their own personal red-pilling. This isn’t meant as an attack on anyone specifically because I think we are all guilty of this to one degree or another. Like most people here probably believe 9/11 was an inside job, but have you ever talked to older people who believe the official story totally? How angry they get when you question it? How they want any counter arguments or inconvenient evidence shut down?
But then the exact same people who don’t believe the official 9/11 narrative will turn around and act exactly like that when someone questions Sandy Hook. And then the same person who questions Sandy Hook will have their own threshold of what cannot be questioned and must be shut down. That might be JFK Jr. or viruses or bio-labs or whatever. But it’s not like those people are completely fair and open-minded either, because they will have their own limits of belief after which they ALSO demand censorship. And on and on it goes like this down the red-pill rabbit hole.
To me, free speech and free thought absolutism is pretty much where you have to go to avoid this. Otherwise everyone is arbitrarily choosing their own level of knowledge that people are allowed to believe and question, and that’s clearly different for everyone.
Also, has no one here ever been straight up humbled by being red-pilled on an issue? Like there was something you absolutely positively believed as true, to the point where you dismissed anyone who said otherwise, only to later learn for yourself that it was false, and not only were you wrong, but you were being a smug asshole while being wrong? Once you experience that flip in knowledge one time, shouldn’t it introduce the idea in your mind that there are other things you could absolutely positively believe that you are ALSO wrong about?
This is a thing? <looks around> What have I missed
It's too difficult to simulate a deep, gravely voice like Alex Jones for too long, unless you're a voice actor. Did JFK Jr have a deep, gravely voice?
He did not.
I've tried telling ya catdude, JOS and the merry band of paytriots that he colludes with should not be promoted here.
Paytriot scum at best. MMM DS asset at worst. Given how many times MSM rags have used JOS as a blanket "example" of the greater research community, I'd wager on the latter.
And that is why, in my humble opinion those here that push this garbage are either completely hoodwinked by these asshats or they are incentivized to push the false material here.
Well, the Brunson bros. Seem to be willing tonwork with him.
https://rumble.com/v209i0u-prophets-and-patriots-episode-45-with-steve-shultz-juan-osavin-loy-brunson-.html
IMO that's a huge red flag that the Brunson case will amount to nothing in the short term.
What is JOS?
Short for Juan O Savin... A well known paytriot grifter who surrounds themself in mystique and frequently pushes all the crap mentioned in the Rolling Stone article: NESARA/GESARA, JFK Jr crap, medbeds and other clandestine technology, the whole USA Inc vs USA narrative and a bunch of other unproven shit that anons have researched and either came up with dead ends or outright debunked.
Dude's a pay to play sophist who brings nothing to the table other than misleading anons and giving MSM ammo to use against anons.
No, nobody ever suggested that Biden is a robot. They can't even get that right. Holy shit those people are fucking retarded.
Yeah they suggested he's a clone. Very different
Or even just body doubles, which is a known thing politicians have all the time, so yeah. The running theory is original biden is long since dead, and all we have left is a literal actor playing a role for deep state interests.
You don't think that's far-fetched?
The author doesn't know the difference between a clone and a robot? Holy shit those people are stupid.
Just because you don't believe it, and even if the majority of the people on this forum don't believe it, it doesn't mean that there aren't Q followers out there that do. They find each other, draw attention to themselves, and here we are.
I've seen it suggested that they are controlled opposition, or straight-up phonies created to make the rest of the movement look bad, but I've got bad news for you, others say the same about GA (coughPDWcough)
I've long noticed a wide spread attitude here that this forum is the end all, be all community of Q supporters. This is the only Q forum I've ever been to, but even I realize there are others out there.
The JFK Jr. theory sounded so absurd to me that I dismissed it outright for years. It was only out of boredom that I looked into it. I’m not a full believer, might not even be a partial believer, but I did learn that the theory is not as completely stupid as I assumed. In some ways it even makes sense. Like at a minimum, JFK Jr. would have known that the people who assassinated JFK and RFK would also want to assassinate him, right? And he had many years to figure that out too. Why would it be so crazy to fake his death to throw them off his trail, or at least get out of their crosshairs? Does anyone have any explanation for why that would be so inconceivable as to be preposterous? Do you also think every other story of someone faking their own death is also preposterous? Do you think the witness protection program is preposterous?
I've never seen a response to this. Plenty of people willing to say it's some preposterous, ridiculous fantasy that people like to cling to, but never seen an explanation of why it's actually so "ridiculous" to begin with.
On the level of ridiculous sounding theories, I feel like JFK Jr alive ranks far under 'a satanic pedophile cabal rules the world', but we all acknowledge that truth and no one tries to flippantly dismiss it as "preposterous" or "fantasy".
I think maybe you replied to my post by mistake?
My mom and aunt are one of these followers. That think Biden is a clone, JFK is alive, and the pope is a lizard-demon.
I think there is controlled opposition pushing that info out to doup Q followers and make us look bad. Particularly non tech savy, dont know what 4-chan is, or even photoshop, Qfollowers.
The sources they cite to me totally glow. Telegram is top one.
I'm curious, how do they respond when you tell them they've gone overboard?
Mmm they just think I dont get it and assume I am the naive one. Like the info is too much for me apparently.. lol
Kinda like how flat earthers react. (Apologies if you are one. Just its similar imo)
I think overly complex blocks of information is a brainwashing tactic. Its deep and complicated and connecting dots all over the place. It triggers something in people.
Ive concisely explaind this to them. But... I let them believe what they want for the most part. I don't argue with anyone about their beliefs. I just affirm mine when they ask or push an issue. Its the best tactic I've found.
Whats sad is my mom is a wiz at civics. They aren't dumb..
I think she uses it as a cope cus the truth is dark..
Notice how they hyperlinked to a Juan O Bullshillin post here?
Wake up folks! Juan O is a fucking parasite PAYtriot at best, a honey pot disinfo MMM source at worst. JOS can take his shit kicker cowboy boots and hit the fucking road!