I haven’t really looked into the Brunson case but I believe that is not a trial to prove election fraud, but rather about how Congress did not uphold their duty to perform a 10-day review of the alternate electors’ claims.
There is no such constitutional "duty" for Congress to perform a "10 day review." The Constitution does not authorize Congress with any power to adjudicate presidential Electoral disputes, except to appoint a court/tribunal specifically tasked with handling such cases. This is a judicial matter. Always has been.
Adjudication of the presidential Electoral dispute was not Congress's responsibility because the body lacks any constitutional authority to do so. The STATE LEGISLATURES are responsible for allowing or worse instructing their executive (Gov or Sec of State) to unlawfully appoint Electors who didn't actually win. The only body with the constitutional authority to adjudicate such judicial matters, is the Court. Because no lower tribunal has explicitly been tasked with such cases, original jurisdiction lies with SCOTUS.
Ok. Your subject knowledge is good. But as a lay man, my question remains the same. What Congress did in 1876 was unconstitutional? If not, what stopped them from doing the same in 2020?
I haven’t really looked into the Brunson case but I believe that is not a trial to prove election fraud, but rather about how Congress did not uphold their duty to perform a 10-day review of the alternate electors’ claims.
There is no such constitutional "duty" for Congress to perform a "10 day review." The Constitution does not authorize Congress with any power to adjudicate presidential Electoral disputes, except to appoint a court/tribunal specifically tasked with handling such cases. This is a judicial matter. Always has been.
Ok. So what Congress did in the disputed 1876 presidential election was not required to be done in 2020?
https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/disputed-election-1876
You already asked this question, which I already answered.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqKp8V3J/x/c/4ToiWKNkZbl
Adjudication of the presidential Electoral dispute was not Congress's responsibility because the body lacks any constitutional authority to do so. The STATE LEGISLATURES are responsible for allowing or worse instructing their executive (Gov or Sec of State) to unlawfully appoint Electors who didn't actually win. The only body with the constitutional authority to adjudicate such judicial matters, is the Court. Because no lower tribunal has explicitly been tasked with such cases, original jurisdiction lies with SCOTUS.
Ok. Your subject knowledge is good. But as a lay man, my question remains the same. What Congress did in 1876 was unconstitutional? If not, what stopped them from doing the same in 2020?