Allopathy isn't a lie. It's simply the use of the scientific method to drive theories on treating disease. It's subject to the limits of what the scientific method can prove. Let me give an example.
The brain is a massive black box for us. Even with all the neurology research we've done, all of the fancy fMRI and PET scans and other crap we throw at the problem, we still don't understand a lot of how the brain works. We can't see inside the black box.
But we ARE careful observers of what goes in and what comes out of the black box. If you give a person cocaine, this is how the person responds. These are the changes we see in the scans. These are the nerve pathways that light up on fMRI. And if you repeat doses, the patient responds this way. If you give a person an SSRI we see their mood stabilizes, evens out, and the patient who previously had debilitating depression can now function.
The SSRI example was deliberate. For years we thought it was the serotonin that explained why they work. If we block the receptors that recover serotonin from the nerve synapse and let the serotonin signal stay on longer, it improves depression, therefore serotonin causes depression, right? That's logical. It's also wrong. See this paper if you're interested in the details. It turns out that as we carefully observe, there's substantial evidence that serotonin isn't what's causing what we see. The drug still works. We have decades of clinical evidence to show that. But we don't know why.
That doesn't mean that the allopathic approach to treating depression is a lie. It simply means we don't know as much as we think we do and we have to continue to ask intuitive questions, generate smart hypotheses, and conduct clever experiments to learn more.
Nope, allopathy is literally a deliberate, calculated deception. You can thank the Rockefeller's and their cohorts for the deception. Allopathy is literally wrong about everything. Not one cause of dis-ease is correct. Because dis-ease is not caused by germs, toxins, genetics, bad diet, poor exercise, cell mutations, etc. It's all nonsense lacking even a modicum of proof. It's even difficult for the allopathic researchers to even arrive at rough correlative studies.
Dis-ease is born in the mind due to unexpected events and situations in life that we cannot easily resolve - scares, frights, anger, losses, separations, self-devaluations, upsets, unsettling experiences, etc.. Every single one of them. Cancers, heart-disease, auto-immune disease, neurodegenerative disease, psychological disease, viral disease, etc. etc., borne in the mind and ultimately resolved in the mind. Matter follows mind. An unbreakable universal law.
Now, that being said, allopathy has concocted every imaginable pill and serum to bring about symptom suppression, pain relief, bacterial healing cessation, hormonal adjustments and brain chemistry alteration. On the surface, masking symptoms and altering chemical pathways can have the appearance of "healing", but this is never truly the case. The body/psyche does all the "healing".
I know why the serotonin gives the appearance of working - masking of increased estrogen levels. Check it out if you're a researcher Depression is caused by an unresolved double-conflict situation of which there are many. As is mania, also caused by a double-conflict situation where the order of conflicts strikes in opposite brain hemispheres depending on the gender, handedness and hormone levels of the individual. The second conflict determines whether the individual will be manic or depressive. And the "manic-depressive" is a person who temporarily resolves their second conflict only to slip back into it over and over again - a "hanging-healing" state.
The pharma drugs don't "fix" the situation - only the "appearance" of it. Depression or mania are both a purposeful biological program the psyche creates to assist the person with conflict resolution. Throwing pharma chemicals at what isn't really a "problem" from the perspective of nature only serves to exacerbate the core issues and potentially cause worse problems for the individual down the road. The fact that some people may "get better" while taking hormones/chemicals/pharma is merely coincidental. When this is the case, the person has simply resolved their active conflict.
And I wouldn't characterize the allopathic approach to treating depression as a "lie". It's undoubtedly a clever solution by those that have been taught to believe that "dis-ease" is something to be "gotten rid of" by any and all means necessary.
Herein lies the fatal flaw of allopathy, as the modality is profoundly incorrect right from the starting block. Based on that premise I would call allopathy's depression treatment brilliant, not a lie. But due to the fatally flawed fundamental premise of allopathy, all "treatments" for "dis-ease" demonstrate a complete lack of comprehension as to what "dis-ease" really is. Naturally, everything that follows this mistaken line of thinking must therefore also be in error.
What if "dis-ease" wasn't something to be "gotten rid of", but instead, was the evidence of a return to homeostasis following an unexpected life situation. If the patient were properly educated on the core causal factors of their depression, their understanding brings relief and a clear path to properly and permanently coming to terms with their active conflicts, and therefore, eliminating their depression.
All natural. As nature never makes a mistake. Our bodies are perfect machines. Our natural state is one of perfect health. Our cells don't "mutate". We don't have an "immune system" (TPTB just hijacked the lymphatic system in 1972) and therefore, our bodies do not "attack themselves". Nor do our bodies degenerate before the age of 120. These are all fallacies based on a mountain of lies that unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of our healthcare professionals have all been taught to believe. It's quite a mess and is going to take decades to unwind. But Covid has been a blessing in disguise, as many millions are now beginning to see dis-ease in a new light and starting to question the establishment.
Allopathy isn't a lie. It's simply the use of the scientific method to drive theories on treating disease. It's subject to the limits of what the scientific method can prove. Let me give an example.
The brain is a massive black box for us. Even with all the neurology research we've done, all of the fancy fMRI and PET scans and other crap we throw at the problem, we still don't understand a lot of how the brain works. We can't see inside the black box.
But we ARE careful observers of what goes in and what comes out of the black box. If you give a person cocaine, this is how the person responds. These are the changes we see in the scans. These are the nerve pathways that light up on fMRI. And if you repeat doses, the patient responds this way. If you give a person an SSRI we see their mood stabilizes, evens out, and the patient who previously had debilitating depression can now function.
The SSRI example was deliberate. For years we thought it was the serotonin that explained why they work. If we block the receptors that recover serotonin from the nerve synapse and let the serotonin signal stay on longer, it improves depression, therefore serotonin causes depression, right? That's logical. It's also wrong. See this paper if you're interested in the details. It turns out that as we carefully observe, there's substantial evidence that serotonin isn't what's causing what we see. The drug still works. We have decades of clinical evidence to show that. But we don't know why.
That doesn't mean that the allopathic approach to treating depression is a lie. It simply means we don't know as much as we think we do and we have to continue to ask intuitive questions, generate smart hypotheses, and conduct clever experiments to learn more.
Nope, allopathy is literally a deliberate, calculated deception. You can thank the Rockefeller's and their cohorts for the deception. Allopathy is literally wrong about everything. Not one cause of dis-ease is correct. Because dis-ease is not caused by germs, toxins, genetics, bad diet, poor exercise, cell mutations, etc. It's all nonsense lacking even a modicum of proof. It's even difficult for the allopathic researchers to even arrive at rough correlative studies.
Dis-ease is born in the mind due to unexpected events and situations in life that we cannot easily resolve - scares, frights, anger, losses, separations, self-devaluations, upsets, unsettling experiences, etc.. Every single one of them. Cancers, heart-disease, auto-immune disease, neurodegenerative disease, psychological disease, viral disease, etc. etc., borne in the mind and ultimately resolved in the mind. Matter follows mind. An unbreakable universal law.
Now, that being said, allopathy has concocted every imaginable pill and serum to bring about symptom suppression, pain relief, bacterial healing cessation, hormonal adjustments and brain chemistry alteration. On the surface, masking symptoms and altering chemical pathways can have the appearance of "healing", but this is never truly the case. The body/psyche does all the "healing".
I know why the serotonin gives the appearance of working - masking of increased estrogen levels. Check it out if you're a researcher Depression is caused by an unresolved double-conflict situation of which there are many. As is mania, also caused by a double-conflict situation where the order of conflicts strikes in opposite brain hemispheres depending on the gender, handedness and hormone levels of the individual. The second conflict determines whether the individual will be manic or depressive. And the "manic-depressive" is a person who temporarily resolves their second conflict only to slip back into it over and over again - a "hanging-healing" state.
The pharma drugs don't "fix" the situation - only the "appearance" of it. Depression or mania are both a purposeful biological program the psyche creates to assist the person with conflict resolution. Throwing pharma chemicals at what isn't really a "problem" from the perspective of nature only serves to exacerbate the core issues and potentially cause worse problems for the individual down the road. The fact that some people may "get better" while taking hormones/chemicals/pharma is merely coincidental. When this is the case, the person has simply resolved their active conflict.
And I wouldn't characterize the allopathic approach to treating depression as a "lie". It's undoubtedly a clever solution by those that have been taught to believe that "dis-ease" is something to be "gotten rid of" by any and all means necessary.
Herein lies the fatal flaw of allopathy, as the modality is profoundly incorrect right from the starting block. Based on that premise I would call allopathy's depression treatment brilliant, not a lie. But due to the fatally flawed fundamental premise of allopathy, all "treatments" for "dis-ease" demonstrate a complete lack of comprehension as to what "dis-ease" really is. Naturally, everything that follows this mistaken line of thinking must therefore also be in error.
What if "dis-ease" wasn't something to be "gotten rid of", but instead, was the evidence of a return to homeostasis following an unexpected life situation. If the patient were properly educated on the core causal factors of their depression, their understanding brings relief and a clear path to properly and permanently coming to terms with their active conflicts, and therefore, eliminating their depression.
All natural. As nature never makes a mistake. Our bodies are perfect machines. Our natural state is one of perfect health. Our cells don't "mutate". We don't have an "immune system" (TPTB just hijacked the lymphatic system in 1972) and therefore, our bodies do not "attack themselves". Nor do our bodies degenerate before the age of 120. These are all fallacies based on a mountain of lies that unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of our healthcare professionals have all been taught to believe. It's quite a mess and is going to take decades to unwind. But Covid has been a blessing in disguise, as many millions are now beginning to see dis-ease in a new light and starting to question the establishment.