You write like a politician. That was a pretty lengthy way to basically explain why you're a good person instead of just saying "I'll go read it now" in the first place.
Not sure if that's supposed to be a backhanded compliment or just a personal observation tied to an insult, but in either case, the point I made still stands.
What I said and what the article says are independent of one another.
Objective truths:
There is a war on men
The Tates have been big antagonists against establishment narratives surrounding masculinity
The Tates have largely been successful in helping men of all ages "up their game" even if there are some elements that are not so savory
As I am currently about to start reading the article, I just want to make it clear that these can exist simultaneously.
Now, off to the races as I attempt to alter my perception via investigative writing! Thanks for the nudge, Fren.
You write like a politician. That was a pretty lengthy way to basically explain why you're a good person instead of just saying "I'll go read it now" in the first place.
Not sure if that's supposed to be a backhanded compliment or just a personal observation tied to an insult, but in either case, the point I made still stands.
The point you made stands on the foundation of how you made it. But yes I suppose it does technically stand.