Homosexuals have no logical right to a child because two men can NEVER reproduce and two women can NEVER reproduce. It is encoded in both nature and biology that same-sex procreation is simply not a thing. Who are you to challenge nature at such a fundamental level? It is obscene. This is not some leftover, outdated systemic bias that heterosexuals rigged in their favor that now needs to be made equitable. No man made this so, it simply is as it is.
Also, what is to stop two pedophile men from pretending to be a gay couple in order to adopt a child for their own sexual gratification? Don’t pretend all pedophiles are dirty old men in trenchcoats. As we have seen with the Epstein revelations, many pedophiles are extremely succesful and run in the highest economic circles. How do you intend to sniff them out? Or worse, have you never even thought about this problem before? I have, and I’ve concluded we must err on the side of caution to protect our most vulnerable - innocent children - and if that means homosexuals do not get the privilege of an experience they themselves cannot biologically achieve in nature, well, take it up with nature. We can’t all dunk like Michael Jordan either.
Here is a thought experiment. Are you okay with a single, unmarried man “adopting” a child for himself? Most people are extremely opposed to that. To even float the idea of this as some kind of “good equitable thing” or a “human right” twenty years ago would have gotten you laughed out of the room, if not outright tossed. And if a single, unmarried man procuring a child for himself is unacceptable, then the same logic applies to two men for the same reason.
This is not about the hatred of homosexuals. This is about the love of children. And I and many others value the SAFETY of children FAR MORE than the SATISFACTION of homosexuals. It’s not even a question.
Homosexuals have no logical right to a child because two men can NEVER reproduce and two women can NEVER reproduce. It is encoded in both nature and biology that same-sex procreation is simply not a thing. Who are you to challenge nature at such a fundamental level? It is obscene. This is not some leftover, outdated systemic bias that heterosexuals rigged in their favor that now needs to be made equitable. No man made this so, it simply is as it is.
Also, what is to stop two pedophile men from pretending to be a gay couple in order to adopt a child for their own sexual gratification? Don’t pretend all pedophiles are dirty old men in trenchcoats. As we have seen with the Epstein revelations, many pedophiles are extremely succesful and run in the highest economic circles. How do you intend to sniff them out? Or worse, have you never even thought about this problem before? I have, and I’ve concluded we must err on the side of caution to protect our most vulnerable - innocent children - and if that means homosexuals do not get the privilege of an experience they themselves cannot biologically achieve in nature, well, take it up with nature. We can’t all dunk like Michael Jordan either.
Here is a thought experiment. Are you okay with a single, unmarried man “adopting” a child for himself? Most people are extremely opposed to that. To even float the idea of this as some kind of “good equitable thing” or a “human right” twenty years ago would have gotten you laughed out of the room, if not outright tossed. And if a single, unmarried man procuring a child for himself is unacceptable, then the same logic applies to two men for the same reason.
This is not about the hatred of homosexuals. This is about the love of children. And I and many others value the SAFETY of children FAR MORE than the SATISFACTION of homosexuals. It’s not even a question.