https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-and-cancer-a-mechanism-of-action
Namely, form immune complexes and bind receptors on cells for removal of unwanted cells. So those three ways: the ADCC, ADCP and CDC - that aid in removal of unwanted cells are all nullified in the scenario where IgG4 is prevalent. Worse than that, since the subclass switch is literally the by-product of continuous antigen stimulation, then this is an immunological endorsement of a ‘win’ for IgG4 if we consider competition for binding sites. In effect, IgG4 outcompetes IgG1 and thus, the scales tip from tumor suppression, to tumor progression. All because of IgG4.
Now I don’t want to scare everyone, but persistent re-injection of a messenger RNA that encodes a foreign, highly immunogenic protein, is NOT a good idea in this context. This is precisely continuous antigen stimulation by spike protein. Not only that, since we know that both the mRNA and the spike protein are long-lasting in the body, you mightn’t even have to re-inject yourself repeatedly qualify as undergoing continuous antigen stimulation. In fact, I would bet that this would be a given. Furthermore, I would bet that due to this continuous antigen stimulation, the IgG1:IgG4 subclass ratio is inverted in people who are persistently making spike, and that these people would be subject to cancer promotion, rather than suppression.
My take home message: This is why people are experiencing relapses of cancers previously in remission and this is why new and rare cancers are appearing as well. (Bold in original)
A friend got the shot early, because a nurse friend of his convinced him to, despite my trying to talk him out of it. A year later he had emergency surgery for a cancer that his doctor said “suddenly and aggressively came out of nowhere”.
The people behind the Died Suddenly documentary need to make another about Cancer Suddenly.
Sorry to hear about your friend. Something that shows promise in fighting cancer (I think especially in the jabbed -- only a theory at this point) is senolytics such as fisetin, quercetin, and theaflavin (natural plant-derived supplements) and dasatinib (a cancer drug).
Pharma is scrambling to create an artificial, patentable senolytic they can sell for big money, but natural senolytics are already available and very safe (although everything does have dangers). Fisetin is found in strawberries, quercetin in onions and apples, and theaflavin is an extract of tea.
Senolytics remove senescent cells. Those cells build up as we get older because the body's removal system for them weakens, and the more senescent cells we have, the "older" our body becomes. Every system in the body is affected by senescent cell accumulation and that includes the immune system and its surveillance function. When THAT becomes weak, new cancer cells are ignored instead of targeted for removal. -- And THAT appears to be a major mechanism (possibly THE major mechanism) for TurboCancer. As we all know by now, the jab wreaks havoc on the immune system.
I'm thinking of doing a post specifically about this topic; the three natural senolytics mentioned above all have strong additional benefits and pretty much zero toxicity, so even if the anti-cancer benefits for the jabbed are small or non-existent, they might be worth taking. There is some mixed data, both pro and con, on their effects during conventional cancer therapy however (there is nearly always some mixed data on anything biological, it seems) so as usual it pays to do some research before an intervention.