It is precisely because these people are off their rockers that it is impossible to cut through all of this hyperbole and get to the actual legal arguments. This lawsuit is literally fabricating a bogus legal argument and cloaking it in everyone’s righteous outrage about fraudulent elections. Just because this guy says “hey do something about this fraud” doesn’t mean that this is viable. And pointing this out is not “dooming.” I wouldn’t be surprised to find out this dude also makes “sovereign citizen” claims elsewhere.

And lots of people are saying he isn’t saying the election was fraudulent or Biden didn’t win. WTF? Read the complaint. All he does his talk about how Biden won fraudulently.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.126764/gov.uscourts.utd.126764.6.1.pdf

Let’s start with his complaint. It’s 101 pages of utter gibberish with a 20 something page complaint and an attached exhibit of the congressional record. It is filled with a lot of true facts. It is also filled with a lot of editorializing. Because he has no idea what he is doing, he acts as though these facts support his causes of action. And people are reading that without getting to his claims for relief. Which is what matters. What cause of action do you have here, Brunson?

Claims:

I. Promissory Estoppel - (p.15)

This is unintelligible. It talks about treason and the right to vote. As if there was some kind agreement between him and all of these members. Promissory estoppel arises out of contract law. It has nothing to do with “right to vote” and “treason” or any of the other buzz words he drops in here. This claim is bogus.

II. Promissory Estoppel - (p.17)

Pretty much same thing as count 1. Trying to have some kind of contract law principles applied to treason. This claim is also bogus.

III. Breach of duty - (p. 18)

In a best case scenario, the only person with a “duty” will be his senators and his congressman. The rest owe no duty to him. They don’t represent him or his interests. But that assumes there is some duty. There is not. Nobody’s congressman has a legal “duty” to anyone. Simply taking an oath of office doesn’t give rise to the entirety of the government having a duty to Brunson. This claim also fails.

IV. Intentional infliction of emotional distress - (p.19)

Seriously? This idiocy pretty much speaks for itself and I won’t waste time explaining the obvious.

V. Fraud - (p. 20)

First, this is just some generalized grievance about the bullshit we all know happened. He starts by claiming fraud in the inducement. But its all based on this bogus theory that the oath of office is some how an agreement with him. Which it isn’t.

This guy doesn’t even understand he does not have any right to vote for president at all. He has a privilege to do so. Because Utah’s legislature affords him this privilege. They can take it away too. Utah could simply vote to have the legislature choose presidential electors and not the public at large. As a lot of states early in our republic used to do.

VI. Civil conspiracy - (p.23)

You need underlying tortious acts to allege civil conspiracy. None of his other 5 counts are viable. Accordingly, this one is also dead.

He actually cites a criminal statute about treason as a basis some court has ability to remove all of these people in his civil case. Uh…what? No.

He demands absurd amounts of money, without any hint of how he has incurred damages of this amount. I am assuming he intends this money to go to him. But even if they are fines, you need a basis for this. You can’t just make the shit up out of thin air.

Your claim is a false, and seriously gives aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States of America as noted below

Is this some kind of Eric Cartman “respect muh authoritay!” comment? Or “Don’t you dare question Alexander Vindman’s patriotism!” type of complete diversion from the issue? He’s basically saying that calling this LARP suit a LARP is also treasonous. Jesus. How unhinged is this guy?

The bottom line is that calling the 2020 election bullshit treason, an act of war, giving aid and comfort to the enemy - whether it is true or it isn’t - doesn’t magically breathe life into claims for relief 1 thru 6. It just doesn’t. Those claims aren’t viable. No matter how outrageous those people acted on Election Day through January 6.

That’s why this is one of two things: (1) a retard; or (2) a grifter. Zero reason anyone should pay attention to this suit. It will fail because it should. It is awful. No amount of sprinkling treason/act of war/aid and comfort/wtf ever mustard on his counts 1 thru 6 shit sandwich make it not a shit sandwich.