Much, if not all, of what you write resonates. including: acknowledging biases but also working to balance or account for them; recognizing the positive functions of stereotyping and confirmation biases, while also recognizing the potential pitfalls or limitations; the issue of the griftiness of the matter at hand, whether deliberate or deluded, not to mention the issues it raises with commentators in the truth sphere who are NOT applying, deliberately or through negligence, due diligence; the nature of the response given to Tracy Beanz's article by the complainant; and certain things being easier said than done.
You also write in very notable style / manner, which to me indicates a certain clarity of thinking, and both of these things are something I truly enjoy!
Thanks for your very good, if not entirely or broadly enough appreciated, contributions.
Thanks for the response.
Much, if not all, of what you write resonates. including: acknowledging biases but also working to balance or account for them; recognizing the positive functions of stereotyping and confirmation biases, while also recognizing the potential pitfalls or limitations; the issue of the griftiness of the matter at hand, whether deliberate or deluded, not to mention the issues it raises with commentators in the truth sphere who are NOT applying, deliberately or through negligence, due diligence; the nature of the response given to Tracy Beanz's article by the complainant; and certain things being easier said than done.
You also write in very notable style / manner, which to me indicates a certain clarity of thinking, and both of these things are something I truly enjoy!
Thanks for your very good, if not entirely or broadly enough appreciated, contributions.