COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities
In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical anal...
To prevent one hospitalisation over 6 months by boosting 31 207–42 836 students, a large university campus may also expect 1429.7–4625.9 young adults to experience grade ≥3 reactogenicity disrupting daily activities or requiring medical care when vaccinated with a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, respectively. Per million third-doses of mRNA vaccine administered, between 45 751.6 and 107 784.4 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity may be created
Per million third doses of mRNA vaccine administered, 23.3–32.0 hospitalisations may be averted while 47.6–147.0 cases of myo/pericarditis may be caused among young males aged 18–29 years (figure 1C). Thus, to prevent a single hospitalisation among young males aged 18–29 years, we estimate between 1.5 and 4.6 occurrences of myo/pericarditis (rates up to 1 in 700053) among males aged 18–29 years (figure 1C). For adolescents aged 16–17 years and using available data from CDC’s VSD,51 we expect 6.3 cases of myo/pericarditis among males and 1.4 among females. Thus, per single hospitalisation averted by boosting 31 207–42 836 young males in this age group, approximately 1.5–6.3 cases of myopericarditis may result.
Rumor around town i that the FDA is going to pull the "vaccine" off the market in early 2023. I can't think of a better way to red pill the normies than having them pull the jab for reasons of safety and efficacy. Heads will explode but not because of blood clots…well, some might be because of blood clots.
Sadly it looks like this study still operates under the premise that the "vaccine" is actually helping people. It's a nice first step for them to admit that for every person it "helps", 18+ other people get serious side effects. Now they just need to take that final second step that it doesn't "help" anyone, it only hurts people, that there is NO positive. So long as they parrot the line that it helps people, it doesn't matter what the ratio is, if one person is "helped" normies don't care if 100 other people drop dead, they will always find a way to mental gymnastics their way into thinking it is God's gift to man.
Yep. This is a key point, and has to be echoed by more than just those experts speaking out, but also namely the dirtbag legacy media scum.
There are a few other sleights of hand drums that still get a beating which need to also be shot down
All of these have to be addressed head on at all times, to keep up the momentum.
Oh, OK, thanks for letting us know…
" medical ethics " - is that anyway related to the Hippocratic Oath .../?
"A Doctor's Remorse" ~ The Thalidomide Scandal of the 1960's
https://www.bitchute.com/video/biWJbT1hP720/
.....
In this episode of "Call the Midwife," at the end of season five, the Thalidomide scandal comes to light in the early 1960's.
The doctor and all the others are genuinely horrified when they learn that his prescribing this drug to "dozens, perhaps scores" of patients may be to blame for the terrible birth defects that they have been seeing in newborn infants.
It is my hope, that doctors and health care professionals of today will see this portrayal of heartfelt remorse, and possibly draw comparisons to their own actions of the last two years, and the ramifications yet to come.
This may be a work of fiction, but in tragic detail it seems to accurately depict the inescapable feelings, and fears, of those of us that know the true scope of what has happened.
When the time comes for doctors of today to inevitably face their own conscience, they may be facing the biggest punishment of all.
Let the truth be known, and lead where it may.
But they will still give the poison to everyone else.....
Duh