With The Kari Lake Appeal To The AZ Supreme Court, If That Gets Tossed Too, And She Appeals To The US Supreme Court, then Both Lake AND Brunson Would Have 2 Lawsuits That Are Essentially Putting The SC In Check Mate - The Great Awakening

134

With The Kari Lake Appeal To The AZ Supreme Court, If That Gets Tossed Too, And She Appeals To The US Supreme Court, then Both Lake AND Brunson Would Have 2 Lawsuits That Are Essentially Putting The SC In Check Mate 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 1 year ago by Xirturn1984 1 year ago by Xirturn1984 +135 / -1

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– Fikkan 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Re: "... putting the SC in check mate."

Uh, that's a pretty big problem on our side. We tend to be integrity-driven people that try to follow the rules and common sense. So, we, therefore, assume the actions of our enemy to be motivated by the same.

But, the entire whole pattern of our enemy is an absolute lack of integrity and complete diametric opposition to common sense.

Projection works both ways and neither are good. Deriving our expectations on events in the near or mid future based on how we would go about it has been a rather constant for a few years now.

We ain't them. They ain't us.

Completely different mindsets. Completely different info streams. Completely different perceptions of reality.

And save your whines about "dividing us". This is a division that's as much biological and it is ideological. It's been a problem for humanity since there's been a humanity.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q