5
Xirturn1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

I dont think i can vote for him; we'll find out hwat happens tomorrow in the primaries

2
Xirturn1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe this is going to set a major legal and cultural precedent that you MUST provide evidence of any wrongdoing on your accuser in order to be taken seriously. Johnny Depp, regardless of what you think, is beloved by people. And they see that Amber Heard is a crazy bitch that answers the question "Why would a woman lie?". Even leftists cant hide that Johnny Depp isnt an abuser. He likes cocaine. Big whoop.

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

How was this possibly leaked? That’s whats getting my antenna up. How are we seeing so much video and hearing so much audio coming from China? Before Trump I feel like this was unheard of. Now somehow the Chinese gov can’t keep a video of their people screaming and wailing off the internet.

2
Xirturn1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

We’ll see how he responds to the Disinformation board

3
Xirturn1984 3 points ago +4 / -1

So it shows we arent a monolith. Nobody he supports Oz regardless of GEOTUS backing

3
Xirturn1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

As a 28yo who fell for this scheme, also incentivize schools to push trades rather than universities. At the very least to push CC over universities

42
Xirturn1984 42 points ago +42 / -0

What if Dorsey was a prisoner in his own company?

It could also be he's trying to save his ass. But right now we're reaching the climax of this movie and we'll see what happens soon.

I remember that lady was doing a lot of the talking when he was on JR with Tim Pool.

2
Xirturn1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

so does Trump but he didnt run for president to make a profit. He lost money in the name of preserving America. Thats true for musk (your comment) but i believe he’s got rhe F U money to turn twitter into a freedom of speech platform. If he were to make it private like he suggested, THEN he’d be profiting at the same time

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neither is suppressing information. The Board of Directors has less rhan 100 shares amongst them. It was never about money

5
Xirturn1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Texas also didnt stupidly plant a bunch of flammable Eucalyptus plants in their state.

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the Yodaphone was being used sort of like an anonymous source. “Oh its an anon source we can’t give it away.” “Oh it’s a top secret phone we can’t just give that away.”

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok so it now its "Im concerned about destroying the DS, but I don't care about the people they hurt." Make that make sense. Or not.

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

What echo chamber. Our cause is to fight against cancel culture and in this case, doxxing one of our own by MSM. And you say you don't care. Telling you to go f off isnt me wanting to live in an echo chamber. It's calling you out for not caring about the exact thing we're fighting to stop.

2
Xirturn1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

"I dont care that the MSM is doxxing and harassing people who did nothing wrong." Fixed it for you :) Get off this page we don't need people like you here.

1
Xirturn1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

no clue what this means. Explain to me like im a 3rd grader cuz i know nothing about stocks

20
Xirturn1984 20 points ago +20 / -0

If it makes you feel better, anytime he mentions Q, his comments go scorched earth on him.

4
Xirturn1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like him but it gets annoying when he goes “Yeah George Soros finances the entire liberal agenda and pedophiles run the world but I’m not talking about ‘those Q Anons people’.

He’s much more easier to listen to than John Burk though.

6
Xirturn1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

“Biden hasn’t called it a hoax.” I don’t think that’s helping you the way you think it is

view more: Next ›