The question, and request, are 100% valid regardless of any history of the questioner. Unless you are, like, taking it as a personal afront.
But in posting anything like this, VETTING it beforehand by tracking down a substantial sauce or date, etc, should really be standard practice. In my opinion.
Dramatic, almost outrageous headlines without any sauce, or linkage, etc, posted in some twit should instantly trigger the response of checking where or when it is from, or if it's real. In my opinion.
That would be my first response (hopefully), and I applaud the Texan with the scant posting history.
Should we ALWAYS be asking "sauce, sauce" whenever its not present? Basic due diligence. Basic. As in 101. In my opinion.
tut tut, mon chat.
The question, and request, are 100% valid regardless of any history of the questioner. Unless you are, like, taking it as a personal afront.
But in posting anything like this, VETTING it beforehand by tracking down a substantial sauce or date, etc, should really be standard practice. In my opinion.
Dramatic, almost outrageous headlines without any sauce, or linkage, etc, posted in some twit should instantly trigger the response of checking where or when it is from, or if it's real. In my opinion.
That would be my first response (hopefully), and I applaud the Texan with the scant posting history.
Should we ALWAYS be asking "sauce, sauce" whenever its not present? Basic due diligence. Basic. As in 101. In my opinion.
This ☝️. 100% this.