Yeah, he still has tons of followers. During the pandemic, being a pro Trump figure, lots of people accepted his view about the pandemic and vaccination. Already a lot of harm done.
Now he is repeating it by pretending to never have been pro-vaccines pro-lockdowns etc, and then telling his still substantial followers that there is no grand conspiracy.
He still has close to a million followers and even if we discount half of that as bots and shills, thats close to half a mil followers. People like him because of his cartoons and because he was supporting Trump long before it was fashionable in creative circles and surprisingly he never had to pay a price for that.
You seem to believe his behaviour helps us somehow. Your turn to give examples.
My theory for Scott being a white hat is that he trail blazes a path for intelligent but arrogant liberal people who ended up brainwashed to follow back to reality.
He does this by publicly taking some big intellectual losses but still coming out ahead in terms of career and stature. He becomes social proof that there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the liberal red-pilled.
We're at the darkest part of that process but he's obviously a very driven person who is gradually shifting our direction in his own obnoxious way.
He has a lot of followers but I don't think they are following his advice. He's a fun guy to spitball ideas with and a lot of his follower interaction, as I recall it when I listened, is argumentative. He basically got his start by analyzing Trump's success in an objective way.
We know he had a private meeting with Trump and it was just before he kicked off his podcasting project. I just kinda suspect he was roped in around then.
It seems our disagreement comes down to how much sway we believe Scott has with his followers.
I maintain Scott is one of ours and an actor and yes I very much hope he files the suit. 🤣
At this point, no way Jose. Just a very bad controlled opposition.
How do you believe Scott's ridiculous behavior does anything but help us? Have any examples?
Yeah, he still has tons of followers. During the pandemic, being a pro Trump figure, lots of people accepted his view about the pandemic and vaccination. Already a lot of harm done.
Now he is repeating it by pretending to never have been pro-vaccines pro-lockdowns etc, and then telling his still substantial followers that there is no grand conspiracy.
He still has close to a million followers and even if we discount half of that as bots and shills, thats close to half a mil followers. People like him because of his cartoons and because he was supporting Trump long before it was fashionable in creative circles and surprisingly he never had to pay a price for that.
You seem to believe his behaviour helps us somehow. Your turn to give examples.
My theory for Scott being a white hat is that he trail blazes a path for intelligent but arrogant liberal people who ended up brainwashed to follow back to reality.
He does this by publicly taking some big intellectual losses but still coming out ahead in terms of career and stature. He becomes social proof that there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the liberal red-pilled.
We're at the darkest part of that process but he's obviously a very driven person who is gradually shifting our direction in his own obnoxious way.
He has a lot of followers but I don't think they are following his advice. He's a fun guy to spitball ideas with and a lot of his follower interaction, as I recall it when I listened, is argumentative. He basically got his start by analyzing Trump's success in an objective way.
We know he had a private meeting with Trump and it was just before he kicked off his podcasting project. I just kinda suspect he was roped in around then.
It seems our disagreement comes down to how much sway we believe Scott has with his followers.