There's also varying degrees of capture, those who push back but don't go public might not be destroyed but their career mysteriously plateaus while others rise past them.
Not how I roll. You're making blanket declarations and basically calling OP out, so if you're going to comment like this (and "stand by your words"), perhaps you should sauce it by example of how the OP is not as based as he thinks he is.
The Q boards have long preached that one literally cannot be a celebrity of any kind without having been captured and leveraged. Is this not canon?
There's also varying degrees of capture, those who push back but don't go public might not be destroyed but their career mysteriously plateaus while others rise past them.
Good point.
OP isn't as based as he thinks he is, and falls into cheerleading and groupthink.
The cabal loves people like this. This mentality has existed since the days of Moses:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+32&version=NIV
Celebrities are no better than golden calfs.
(Note the number 32)
John Rich has specifically called out Bohemian Grove. I think you need to calm your tone in some of these replies.
I stand by my words. Report me if you're that gay.
Not how I roll. You're making blanket declarations and basically calling OP out, so if you're going to comment like this (and "stand by your words"), perhaps you should sauce it by example of how the OP is not as based as he thinks he is.
Very convincing.
Right? Every single one, imo.