They do have to be verifiable, just like polls, they can be taken from non representative groups or even made up entirely. The amount of similar evidence that has been completely fabricated and used against us for decades makes it have a bad odor IMO. These things require citations and then verification, most people don't remember both of those parts, they just remember the part they use in their rhetoric.
Agreed. But you can never get direct evidence unless you investigate. And you'll never investigate unless you propose a link.
Unlike Fauci, this is science.
Statistics ARE evidence....
They do have to be verifiable, just like polls, they can be taken from non representative groups or even made up entirely. The amount of similar evidence that has been completely fabricated and used against us for decades makes it have a bad odor IMO. These things require citations and then verification, most people don't remember both of those parts, they just remember the part they use in their rhetoric.
Statistics only apply to a theoretical world, not the real one.