BREAKING: Trump endorses Kevin McCarthy for Speaker
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (151)
sorted by:
I consider different possibilities and have considered that we are simply sharing information in a closed environment, like an echo chamber. I have considered that Q may be nothing more than a cryptic LARP. I have considered that the information about the DS and the Globalists are not a unified group, but disparate entities with simple power seeking behavior without a monolithic core group. However, I have ruled out many of these possibilities and have settled on a hidden war between two groups. Each have their public face and a private face. As in all wars, there are plans, offensives, reactions and defensive moves. The apparent chaos in the world is a result of upset plans and resultant reactions and counter reactions. Many of these things have been happening in the world, however technology changed and social media has upset the balance and provided an avenue to reveal what is happening without censorship and propaganda. This resulted in the globalists having to neutralize the social media ability to freely spread real time information. The subsequent exposure of the censorship is a countermove of Patriots undermining and revealing the manipulation.
Of course everyone is capable of determining what they choose to believe, but I appreciate your support. In the end, this will all result in a victory for one side or the other. How this will be recorded in history will be decided by the victor. We could be right or we could be wrong, either way, time will provide us with an answer. Let's hope we all survive to discuss the merits of our understanding of our current situation.
I appreciate your open mindedness. For me the main thing is a scenario like you are describing: where high level military or intelligence went and officially "recruited" Trump would be completely in violation of the principals that our country was founded on and the ethics and philosophy which are instilled in all officers in the military. The military is supposed to be above electoral politics. It one thing for people to say privately "I think you should run for President"....it would be entirely another for them to show up acting in their official capacity and "bless" a particular candidate. I think some people probably went and "suggested" running to Trump, but I don't think they were acting officially at the time.
I think it basically comes down to two camps: those who believe in fighting fire with fire, and those who think principals and facts will prevail long term. I subscribe to the latter, but I'm sympathetic to the former. I agree, regardless of whether either of us is correct or not I'll pray that we have the opportunity to look back at it and laugh.
Thanks for the reply!
Interesting points, but I believe we are actually more in agreement than the surface would suggest. I do believe that there is a solid line between Right and Wrong and that actions must remain within the bounds of ethics and morality. The military is officially neutral and is outside of partisan politics. Individual military officers and enlisted are still citizens and still have the right to vote and even to lobby for a particular candidate, as their conscience dictates (in an unofficial capacity). The most critical aspect that I think we are not quite in tune with is the fact that the pinnacle of the military member Oath is to Protect and Defend the Constitution. In the particular situation that we are facing, and have been facing for generations is a threat to the foundation of this great nation, a very real and grave threat. This is not a politics issue, this is an issue of an attack on the foundations of the Constitution. The US government, military and businesses have been infiltrated by enemies that have vowed the destruction of individual freedoms and the destruction of the very core of this Great American experiment. Technically, if Q is an organization of patriotic Americans whose purpose is to undermine and defeat a "cabal" or organization whose primary purpose is the overthrowing of the foundation of US of A, then it is a "conspiracy". A conspiracy in that they have to operate covertly to undermine the efforts of another group. In this particular scenario, their cause is a noble one that directly falls in line with each of their Oath's of Office. Prior to the creation of Democracy and subsequent to the Greeks Republic, the governments of the world were typically Oligarchies. Whether this was based upon monarchies or another form of government, they ultimately had no Rights for individuals. Even Democracies created after the fall of many of the monarchies, the individual was still not granted any real sense of Rights. The American Experiment codified the Rights of every individual, regardless of station in society and granted an "equal" opportunity for pursuing individual Freedom and self determination. This is the novel construct of this Nation. This is ultimately what is at stake. Our Founding Fathers knew this and ingrained in every Oath of Office the sworn Oath to Protect and Defend this ideal. In fact, every person that has violated their Oath is effectively a traitor and guilty of treason. The concept that you have suggested is beyond the scope of the military to select a political candidate is true, however it has not been violated in any respect. The military cannot have it's leaders come out and support a particular candidate in any Official capacity that would give the appearance of an official stance of the military as a whole. Any military member, regardless of rank can support a candidate that they believe to be in line with their beliefs in a private setting. The law effects only the appearance of impropriety and publicly supporting one candidate in an official capacity that would give the appearance of the military endorsing that candidate. Ultimately, I believe we are actually in agreement and the misunderstanding is due to the difficulties in expression inherent to an online forum.