1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you haven't learned by now that you can't take all drops at literal face value then I shouldn't waste any more breath on you.

Disinfo is necessary, and for reasons many people fail to grasp.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate your open mindedness. For me the main thing is a scenario like you are describing: where high level military or intelligence went and officially "recruited" Trump would be completely in violation of the principals that our country was founded on and the ethics and philosophy which are instilled in all officers in the military. The military is supposed to be above electoral politics. It one thing for people to say privately "I think you should run for President"....it would be entirely another for them to show up acting in their official capacity and "bless" a particular candidate. I think some people probably went and "suggested" running to Trump, but I don't think they were acting officially at the time.

I think it basically comes down to two camps: those who believe in fighting fire with fire, and those who think principals and facts will prevail long term. I subscribe to the latter, but I'm sympathetic to the former. I agree, regardless of whether either of us is correct or not I'll pray that we have the opportunity to look back at it and laugh.

Thanks for the reply!

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're free to believe what you like. More power to you, honestly! All I know is I've been 99% correct with my predictions while other Q researchers with ideas more in line with yours have much worse records.

It's good to explore multiple avenues and theories though. Over time, the truth shall prevail.

9
PineapplePatriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah, him and his followers/employees seem to have picked up that nobody was buying that so they basically disappeared for a long time and now are back trying to infiltrate the community again but without mentioning that stuff right away.

15
PineapplePatriot 15 points ago +16 / -1

Just wanted to add context. Apologies if it came across as accusatory! Austin Steinbart is the guy who came out claiming that Q was him in the future sending notes to himself in the past. According to his own story he attended a school run by the CIA where they trained him. So either he's lying and suspicious or he's telling the truth and is even more suspicious.

20
PineapplePatriot 20 points ago +22 / -2

This guy is an associate/dickrider of noted shill/plant Austin Steinbart. He is as the kids say "sus AF" so I would find better sources in the future.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who bought one can sell it for more than they bought it for. I don't see how you could call that being a "sucker"...

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe he knows something we don't? The reality is someone needs to get a majority vote to take the position. There are only a few people who stand a realistic chance of getting those votes. Perhaps out of all the candidates who are feasible, this is the least bad one due to factors unseen at the ground level.

0
PineapplePatriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

I wish people would let go of these silly fantasies that POTUS or the military are these comic book super heroes who know are LITERALLY omniscient and infallible.

President Trump was never "hired" or "recruited" by the military in the way some people seem to imagine. Like a general showed up on his door and said "Sir, you have to save the world and come with me" like in a movie scene. Nor is it likely that the Q op is an official on the books affair. What probably actually happened is that Trump and various officials/employees became aware that they were working towards similar goals and started working together.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn't invent email- that is the point. He was among the first people to use the phrase "electronic mail" but he is not the very first and he has nothing to do with any of the technology that modern email uses.

Even if you ignore that in Shivas own telling of the story it was his boss who actually came up with the idea and told him what to do. Although again, other people were already working on email when that happened.

3
PineapplePatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Merry Christmas everyone! I have to travel a lot today, but wanted to say hello to all my patriot frens. May God bless and keep you all!

2
PineapplePatriot 2 points ago +4 / -2

A big ego can be tolerable, but it has to be truly earned.

It's clear Shiva is a bright guy who's done some good work, but I don't think he has enough actual documented successes to have as big a head as he seems to have. I mean, here he is literally suggesting that one of the largest and most influential companies in the world should be handed over to him despite never running a company anything close to it's size or type.

8
PineapplePatriot 8 points ago +12 / -4

The way he tries to bring up that he "invented email" at every chance he has when he definitely did not makes me suspicious of him. Just in this screenshot alone it's mentioned twice. I think he's a paytriot/attention seeker personally. I'm all for looking at his data when he presents it, however him as a person...I don't know if I would trust him to run twitter.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you that saying "I'll accept it if I win, but not if I lose" is not the best sound bite but really what else was there for her to do? If she didn't voice the suspicions before the election, then people would say "WhY DiDn'T yOu SaY AnyThInG EaRlieR?".

4
PineapplePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think a lot of patriots vastly overestimate their individual importance in the plan. We should be focused primarily on our families and loved ones and ensuring they are safe and taken care of. After that just staying informed and passing information on to others as needed. Stay engaged politically by voting in all elections and volunteering.

If you ever find yourself obsessing over "decodes" or trying to guess what the next step of "the plan" is or what you should be doing, you're doing it wrong. Not only is it unlikely to help, it may be harmful.

Focus on having a positive impact locally. Sure keep up to date and have some fun theorizing, but for the most part we should accept the plan will be revealed only in time and we may never see it all. You may never get some magical validation moment where someone confirms everything you ever thought. All we can do is continue on doing our best.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

The president has limited authority to send troops or direct the military, but explicitly does not have the authority to declare war on his own. Only congress can do that. When it comes to legal matters, technical terms matter. Sending troops somewhere is not the same as an official war declaration.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is a great write up and overview, however there is one issue:

Here, President Trump calls himself a war time President, "In a true sense, We Are At War". This is a war declaration.

The president doesn't have the authority to declare war by himself, and even if he did there's no court in the world that would accept a casual remark in media as an official act.

So it definitely wasn't a "war declaration" but it could have been POTUS letting us know there was some sort of secret act of congress, or something like that which did officially put us at war.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not a bad guy but he's a blowhard who massively exaggerates a lot of things, especially his own accomplishments and credentials. I did some business with him back in the cuecat days. You definitely could do much worse for an auditor, but you also could do a lot better.

3
PineapplePatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it would still put them in a tough spot. it's definitely an interesting theory with potential. I personally think this is more a basic troll than a serious op but we'll see!

4
PineapplePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

A government agency is actually telling Twitter to take down certain accounts?

That's not the problem so much. I imagine very occasionally LEOs need to ask social media to take down accounts - if they are helping plan terrorism or crimes or something.

The issue is they are telling Twitter to take down accounts due to JOKES and POLITICAL OPINIONS. That's a horse of different color, in fact it's not even a horse it's a duckbill platypus...

6
PineapplePatriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

now they have to destroy Ethereum

This is not strictly true, technically there are things they can do but they would be very difficult/painful and require a consensus of a lot of powerful people - like branching.

3
PineapplePatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

These sorts of errors happen, usually it's pretty easy to correct them when it's obvious what the person intended. This shouldn't affect anything except embarrass whoever typed this up and/or didn't proofread it well enough.

1
PineapplePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're correct, it's possible that he gets a cut of the first sales. He likely won't get a cut of secondary sales, but that's true of most NFTs.

2
PineapplePatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

ahhh of course! I kept wracking my brain for things that happened in 1700 haha!

view more: Next ›