Anons have been well trained over the years not to react to dates or what seems like important events/markers. At the same time, it is always exciting to look forward to something big that seems possible. For Brunson Case, the one thing that stands out for me is the 1/6 conference date. If SCOTUS had to dismiss it, they could have kept it for conference on 12/2 or 12/9 and be over it without creating this noise. Let's see what happens!
Comments (12)
sorted by:
It does seem like this has been timed to play a role in the current movie we are watching in the house. You have to wonder if it will be a plot twist.
Interestingly, it appears McCarthy is NOT named in that suit.
That IS interesting 🤔
Matt Gaetz is the ring leader for 20 hold out Repubs during the House Speaker votes. This stall tactic has to be connected to SCOTUS - Brunson case review. If for no other reason to continue a Conservative narrative in the fake news media. From House vote, right in to SCOTUS-Brunson case (like Roe v Wade coverage last year) Tucker Carlson may report on the Brunson case.
Interesting take on this case....
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/
The article has valid points but I do think that it missed 1 or 2 critical points such as:
I totally understand that SCOTUS should not have power to remove congress members and sitting president. But what the article missed was that voter fraud or rather aiding voter fraud which is the main allegation in Brunson case comes under treason which gives authority to SCOTUS to remove all these members and is covered under the constitution. The article never discussed this point which is unique to this case.
Conference date of 1/6 as mentioned above which is odd, especially if SCOTUS just wants to dismiss it without noise.
Anyways, I guess we will know soon!!
Watch "Just Human" talk about this on Rumble. I believe him and other researchers. This is nothing. Direct your hopium somewhere else.
I saw his video. He had valid points but I do think that he missed 1 or 2 points such as:
I totally understand that SCOTUS should not have power to remove congress members and sitting president. But what he missed was that voter fraud or rather aiding voter fraud which is the main allegation in Brunson case comes under treason which gives authority to SCOTUS to remove all these members and is covered under the constitution. Just Human never discussed this point which is unique to this case.
Conference date of 1/6 as mentioned above which is odd, especially if SCOTUS just wants to dismiss it without noise.
Anyways, I guess we will know soon!!
Considering the ramifications of this case, i.e. decapitating the administrative branch and effectively dissolving the legislative branch, I doubt that even Justice Thomas has the courage to follow through regardless of the evidence.
Yes that is most likely. But, if this case has merits and house cleaning is to be done as per plan, then this is a better solution than using the military to avoid any civil unrest!
That would be great. However, once the DS realizes "the jig is up" and they are going down, they will employ the Sampson Option and activate their private armies. BLM, ANTIFA, not to mention the hundreds of thousands who have infiltrated across the open borders. The additional threat is the Islamic sleeper cells who may be activated if their leaders see an opportunity to destabilize or take over the US.
Realistically though, I think at best this case may be just another in a deluge of red pills that Normies seem unable to swallow.
IMO, action by SCOTUS in Brunson case or any such significant action cannot be done without support of Military, either directly or indirectly acting in the background. But yes, this case, like many other events in the past, may also turn out to be of litile significance and dismissed by SCOTUS.