The Elon link was sticked when I posted this. If you are having difficulty seeing the connections, I feel sorry for you. Thats all I'm going to say. Have a good day.
Your condescending attitude is noted and appreciated!
But, either way, I didn't mean my comment to be a personal criticism.
As it turns out, the fault is mine because I didn't read the subject line correctly, and failed to see the direct reference to the stickied post. (Which I had seen, btw.)
JH, don't you think its about time we buried the hatchet and moved on? We don't need to agree on everything, but perhaps we could try being civil despite disagreements?
We bury the hatchet? I have never commented on any of your posts. The negative comments have always been initiated by you. My retorts may be condescending, but they only got that way over time.
Well, to be honest I don't see it that way. I found your responses to comments that I made to be frustrating and obtuse, although in almost all cases where I offered, quite politely I believe, detailed questions of your analysis, you simply ignored those comments. Moreover, when I went out of the way to emphasize or appreciate your work as part of my questions, or criticisms, you also ignored that.
But what do you consider "negative"? Disagreement? Stating that someone is wrong in their analysis? Are these what you consider negative?
But maybe its an irrelevant question. Here, I suggested "burying the hatchet" and your response is: "it's all your fault. You are the only person who has any fault here, and if I'm condescending, well, that's your fault too."
Either way, can I then assume that you don't wish to take any personal responsibility for any misunderstandings, or make any effort to resolve (what I personally think amounts to) bad blood between us?
Yur gonna have to include more context, afaics. What did Musk do, and how is it connected to this Q drop?
Qdrop alone, and no musk. Not even a link. <.........?>
The Elon link was sticked when I posted this. If you are having difficulty seeing the connections, I feel sorry for you. Thats all I'm going to say. Have a good day.
Your condescending attitude is noted and appreciated!
But, either way, I didn't mean my comment to be a personal criticism.
As it turns out, the fault is mine because I didn't read the subject line correctly, and failed to see the direct reference to the stickied post. (Which I had seen, btw.)
JH, don't you think its about time we buried the hatchet and moved on? We don't need to agree on everything, but perhaps we could try being civil despite disagreements?
We bury the hatchet? I have never commented on any of your posts. The negative comments have always been initiated by you. My retorts may be condescending, but they only got that way over time.
Well, to be honest I don't see it that way. I found your responses to comments that I made to be frustrating and obtuse, although in almost all cases where I offered, quite politely I believe, detailed questions of your analysis, you simply ignored those comments. Moreover, when I went out of the way to emphasize or appreciate your work as part of my questions, or criticisms, you also ignored that.
But what do you consider "negative"? Disagreement? Stating that someone is wrong in their analysis? Are these what you consider negative?
But maybe its an irrelevant question. Here, I suggested "burying the hatchet" and your response is: "it's all your fault. You are the only person who has any fault here, and if I'm condescending, well, that's your fault too."
Either way, can I then assume that you don't wish to take any personal responsibility for any misunderstandings, or make any effort to resolve (what I personally think amounts to) bad blood between us?
wow. Snarky.... :p
But yeah, turns out I didn't even read the subject line properly. Mea culpa.