Don’t scroll by without Reading this by Lauren Boebert....
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (112)
sorted by:
I swear, the right needs a few editors. Why is it there are always minor mistakes that I just know will be latched on to?
Good messaging that I just know will be ignored in favor of "HEY LOOK AT THE DUMB CONSERVATIVES RAHRAHRAHRAHRAH".
Now that said, Boebert's one of the best and a good cookie. I do believe that official releases of any kind should be properly read over by an aide though.
Although on the flip side, commonly made mistakes indicate more of a likelihood that the person actually wrote it themself, as opposed to ghost writing.
True that, but when ever I write something formally I always ensure I read it multiple times, take a step away for a few minutes, come back and read it again, etc.
It's completely different from when I try to portray my way of talking or tone through text as I often try to do on forums or chat rooms. On here, I'll make grammatical errors or twist the English language to try and show a playful attitude, or I'll let my impulses guide me because of my enthusiasm.
I guess I've just seen too many people refocus viewers away from the messaging to tiny errors that it becomes an internalized cringe reaction when I see small errors on official documents.
Some of us are at a level of education in our lives that we automatically catch errors like that when we are reading something. It appears that we are alike in that regard. And as an aside note, a person could make a full-time job correcting errors posted by many, many people on this board. I'm sure you can relate. :)
I'd apply for that position. It's kind of fun for me, like crossword puzzles. Typos jump out at me, screaming for assistance.