No problem with you talking about stuff but ... are you there? You're making a lot of assumptions like military are compromised HENCE rounding up patriots.
Aren't the military family men and women and offspring off the millions of protestors, fields of protestors you can see with your own eyes, yes?
So critical thinking as you proudly state all the time, you think the mil, who are made up of these millions of protestors relatives ... are siding with ... Lula, huh?
"So critical thinking as you proudly state all the time, you think the mil, who are made up of these millions of protestors relatives ... are siding with ... Lula, huh?"
Well when they're actively standing aside (or even actively aiding) to let the police teargass and round up the patriots who are making a stand it certainly seems that way. Perhaps our local Brazilian pede has some insight. But based off of her previous posts it doesn't sound optimistic.
"militaries are highly compartmentalized. also, there are lots of them. knowing that a few compartments are corrupt in no way invalidates "military is the only way". just a real smooth brain take."
"A few compartments" LOL I'd say if anything the majority is corrupt barring maybe a handful of "compartments" (however you're referring to it). Sorry to break it to you but leadership permeating all levels is compromised. The Vax mandate being enforced coupled with very few officers refusing to go along should have told you that alone. That's not even going into all of the horrible other shit our military leadership is responsible for. That's not some smooth brain take, that's just how it is. Being in denial about this doesn't make it untrue.
Also saying there's lots of militaries is complete deflection and cope. We know that the military that's specifically referred to is the American one (and maybe some close allies).
Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize the onus was on me to prove a negative. Wasn't aware that's how evidence worked here.
Look, it should be abundantly clear that the military is compromised whether in the USA or in Brazil. There's an obvious correlation between what's going on there and what's been happening here. If people look at the military siding with Lula is somehow a win for us and indicative of the plan being in full swing who am I to let the facts get in the way of their beliefs?
To answer your question, I'm here because this community is made up of critical thinkers who believe in freedom of speech (supposedly) and there's usually interesting stories that aren't always trending elsewhere. As it turns out though most people don't really seem interested in conversations just huffing copium to reaffirm their preconceived notions.
Rules that prevent you from seeing any sort of comment or discussion you personally take issue with?
Try addressing any of my points about the military or just keep deflecting. This is getting boring though.
No problem with you talking about stuff but ... are you there? You're making a lot of assumptions like military are compromised HENCE rounding up patriots.
Aren't the military family men and women and offspring off the millions of protestors, fields of protestors you can see with your own eyes, yes?
So critical thinking as you proudly state all the time, you think the mil, who are made up of these millions of protestors relatives ... are siding with ... Lula, huh?
"So critical thinking as you proudly state all the time, you think the mil, who are made up of these millions of protestors relatives ... are siding with ... Lula, huh?"
Well when they're actively standing aside (or even actively aiding) to let the police teargass and round up the patriots who are making a stand it certainly seems that way. Perhaps our local Brazilian pede has some insight. But based off of her previous posts it doesn't sound optimistic.
So pointing out that the Brazilian military is currently rounding up patriots is breaking the rules of the site?
Interesting because that's one of the top posts on the front page right now.
"militaries are highly compartmentalized. also, there are lots of them. knowing that a few compartments are corrupt in no way invalidates "military is the only way". just a real smooth brain take."
"A few compartments" LOL I'd say if anything the majority is corrupt barring maybe a handful of "compartments" (however you're referring to it). Sorry to break it to you but leadership permeating all levels is compromised. The Vax mandate being enforced coupled with very few officers refusing to go along should have told you that alone. That's not even going into all of the horrible other shit our military leadership is responsible for. That's not some smooth brain take, that's just how it is. Being in denial about this doesn't make it untrue.
Also saying there's lots of militaries is complete deflection and cope. We know that the military that's specifically referred to is the American one (and maybe some close allies).
Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize the onus was on me to prove a negative. Wasn't aware that's how evidence worked here.
Look, it should be abundantly clear that the military is compromised whether in the USA or in Brazil. There's an obvious correlation between what's going on there and what's been happening here. If people look at the military siding with Lula is somehow a win for us and indicative of the plan being in full swing who am I to let the facts get in the way of their beliefs?
To answer your question, I'm here because this community is made up of critical thinkers who believe in freedom of speech (supposedly) and there's usually interesting stories that aren't always trending elsewhere. As it turns out though most people don't really seem interested in conversations just huffing copium to reaffirm their preconceived notions.