Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED
SEE TOP COMMENT!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf
Page 5
22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
No legal theory ? So I guess the constitution should be used for lining bird cages, and the corrupt politicians have all the answers.
They never made a constitutional claim. In fact, they specifically tried denying they had any federal claims at all to argue why this should not have been removed from state court. That is how totally derp these people are. No clue what they are doing. At least, from a law perspective. They appear to have been rather successful on monetizing their legal ineptitude though.
Correct. Under the Constitution, neither Congress nor President of the Senate has any explicit authority to adjudicate Electoral disputes. Thus, it's not possible to convict them of negligence for having refused to take actions not authorized to begin with.
The Electoral disputes have, and remain a judicial matter. But the Court can't make a legal ruling on a bad argument. Have to ask the right questions if you want the right answers.