Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED
SEE TOP COMMENT!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf
Page 5
22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
Regardless of whether there is standing or not ( I believe there is), this case is way too big for the SC to even touch with a 100ft pole. The removal of hundreds of politicians for essentially deeming their actions treasonous is what we all want to see because of what they did.
To uphold the constitution is what the SC is here for but we know as a collective, they are chicken shit and ruling in favor of this would put their lives at greater stake than Row v. Wade ever did. They don't have it in them and we on GAW should know (and accept) this by now so to doom about this seems silly. Time to keep grounded and realistic Frens.