5
LRAD 5 points ago +5 / -0

He was talking about the owner of the Truth Social @Q account.

1
LRAD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not certain anything bad would happen but if people keep calling getting the jab AIDS/VAIDS, it would stand to reason that one shouldn't have sexual contact with the jabbed.

8
LRAD 8 points ago +8 / -0

Scary if true. Especially for anyone who avoided the jab but has since slept with someone who got the jab 😑

2
LRAD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very true. That's before my lifetime. In the 90s visiting Seattle for things like a mariners game was a good time and it did feel like the Emerald City.

When King County "found" an extra 7,000 ballots to finally give Gregoire the win was my awakening to how WA runs elections is corrupt. It still amazes me how I can explain to my friends and family how chain of custody for mail in ballots is a joke and how easy it is to manipulate and create fraudulent ballots on top of that to control an election is too easy yet they refuse to even consider the corruption.

0
LRAD 0 points ago +1 / -1

Disagree. My friends and family are not watching or understanding. They are so exhausted with everything they could care less and just focus on their day to day.

8
LRAD 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lol, welcome to the "westside of the mountains". Been this way since the start and won't change.

It grew up in central WA. Became a cop in western WA for over a decade and threw in the towel. Fled back to east of the mountains.

Western WA is a lost cause cesspool shit-hole.

2
LRAD 2 points ago +3 / -1

This theory implies the world is watching the show which isn't true. Us awakened Frens are watching. Our friends and family aren't. Look around. Ask around. None of them care about Bondi and most dont know she's the AG or even what an AG is.

The show is for us, but the rest could care less.

2
LRAD 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm having reservations. She's dragging her feet, referrals aren't leading to prosecutions, she lobbied for Pfizer and ended an investigation into them for bribery.

She's been all Fox talk and no action

2
LRAD 2 points ago +2 / -0

GROK Copypasta:

The U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 2, Clause 3) grants the President the power to make recess appointments to fill vacancies during a Senate recess, but it does not specify a minimum duration for the recess. However, legal and practical interpretations, particularly from Supreme Court rulings, provide clarity:

Minimum Recess Duration: The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning established that a Senate recess must be at least 10 days for the President to exercise recess appointment powers. Recesses shorter than 10 days are generally considered too brief, though the Court noted that even 10 days is a minimum and may not always suffice if the Senate is functionally available (e.g., through pro forma sessions).

Pro Forma Sessions: The Senate can block recess appointments by holding pro forma sessions (brief, often perfunctory meetings) during recesses. These sessions, even if minimal, can prevent a recess from being considered long enough for appointments, as they indicate the Senate is technically in session.

Practical Implications: For a recess appointment to be valid, the Senate must be in a recess of 10 days or more without pro forma sessions, and the vacancy must either arise during the recess or exist prior to it. Recess appointments expire at the end of the Senate’s next session (typically the following year).

Based on the 2025 Congressional calendar, the August recess (August 4 to September 1, 2025) and the end-of-year recess (mid to late December 2025 to early January 2026) are likely the only periods long enough to meet the 10-day threshold, assuming no pro forma sessions are held. For example: August recess: ~28 days, sufficient for recess appointments. End-of-year recess: Typically 2–4 weeks, also sufficient if uninterrupted.

2
LRAD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even better! Would that work like this?:

Fire Bondi, appoint interim, recess appoint said interim in August, AG good to go until January confirmation hearings.

12
LRAD 12 points ago +14 / -2

This far along. This many years later. People like Bondi, Kash and Bongino essentially running for their positions off of Epstein, why shouldn't we be enraged?

12
LRAD 12 points ago +14 / -2

And there's enough indications over the years that very high up people participated in Epstien's depravities. Why isn't the administration concerned about them not being held accountable?

16
LRAD 16 points ago +16 / -0

Trump and Bondi's response indicated Epstein was a lone wolf pervert and there weren't other elites involved in his depravities.

Eidt: Bondi also she had no knowledge of Epstein working for any intel agencies.

32
LRAD 32 points ago +34 / -2

Reporter just asked Bonid about Epstein and Trump was offended and jumped in and asked the reporter "are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein!?"

It was really strange.

Edit: link to the moment

https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1942622749568164156?t=L_5iajWU8Mc62-akAVSweQ&s=09

1
LRAD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump admin took the blackmailed footage to blackmail the blackmailed

Or

The prior administration destroyed the evidence. If this happened, I dunno what Bondi was talking about though.

view more: Next ›