Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED - The Great Awakening

234

Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED SEE TOP COMMENT!

posted 1 year ago by DRan 1 year ago by DRan +234 / -0

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf

Page 5

22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.

193 comments

193 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (193)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– mundania 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Could certiorari be denied because the case belongs in the Military Justice System?

No. If the case belonged in the military justice system (which would also mean that Brunson had really cosmically screwed up every step of the way so far) the court would have issued an order appropriate for that. But this is a civil case asking for civil remedies - the military criminal justice system would not have jurisdiction.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– TSearch 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Thanks, I can see how what I asked makes no sense, a civil case can’t move into a military court.

You made me clarify my real question. Where does the authority to enforce this part of the 14th Amendment reside?

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

From the January 6th Unselect Committee, to some low-level Uniparty people in Georgia trying to disqualify MGT, and the Brunson Case, there seems to be an effort to answer this question.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q