4 rockets on launch pads at the same time for 4 booms? Posts at 1:30 and 1:36 are pretty interesting to read. Links in comments.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B- B- B- B O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
I didnt suggest anything. I've been brainwashed since kindergarten and a reddit tier smooth brain. I'm asking the really smart, knowledgeable Twitter tier people questions. So I can learn.
But since it was stated space travel requires other technology yet space is being presented as a conditional value status of a vacuum. The next glaring question is how did this proposition become a presented status in the discussion. How was space determined to be a near vacuum state?
STFU you didn't suggest anything... do you need me to list the inferences you've made so far?
Or better, can you answer the questions since you're now onto the insult phase?
You know you have a strong argument when your first resort was a fallacy and your second reaction was insults.
Ok so no real answer for how it is concluded space is a near vacuum but humans have not been there. No problem. Didnt expect an answer anyway, your types can be spotted light years away. Hypothetically speaking since space travel can't exist of coarse, therefore light years is a fictional inference.
The irony here of accusing insults is incredibly comical though.
I'll STFU now and go to reddit, that I've never used, for weak fallacies. The sequier talking points of supposition presented have no bearing to maintain my interest.
You dodged each question your way. You conflated me with another poster, kept saying it's all deep fake, when I only said that a rocket engine can't get thrust in a vacuum because there's not enough matter to push against to obtain the reaction of thrust.
Anyway, I'll answer another of your questions:
Space is inferred as near vacuum because atomspheric density declines with altitude.