Having trouble explaining the Hegelian Dialectic to normies? This old Far Side comic perfectly illustrates the Hegelian Dialectic at work. Problem -> Reaction -> Solution
(media.greatawakening.win)
🐸 WAG THE FROG 🐸
Controlled opposition is absolutely not what you are claiming it is.
Controlled opposition would be when something is posed as part of the opposition when it is in fact not part of that opposition.
The comic illustrates absolutely none of the above.
Controlled opposition is wolves in sheep’s clothing, not a wolf causing an issue and then offering a solution to their own caused issue. The two are completely different.
Except the example is not even a false flag though. The letter via brick is openly the cause. How in the world are you assuming the example is a false flag and controlled opposition or an attempt to deceive without being open?? Are you aware of what you’re saying?
I actually don’t think you understand at all what the comic is portraying because you think that two different entities are being setup when it is clear to even the victim that it is all the same entity and that there is nothing they can do about it. But it seems like you’re on an ego thing and can’t be reasoned with so good luck with that.