Bosi still wants, after all of this, to tell me what I can and can't put into my own body for example
New to me, whats this in reference to?
He wants a 2% tax rate which is a slippery slope back to where we are.
From what I remember, he wants sales tax. If he wants an income tax, no way Jose.
Taxing commerce is the only way to fund the government.- no matter how small it may be, but taxing indivduals is against natural laws (and unconstitutional) and I am always going to be against it - no matter how small the amount it.
Anarcho Capitalist
Yeah be careful using these terms. You are better off using a new term rather than something that exists because a lot of people on the left who believe in anarchy look at it differently.
Drugs all the way down to marijuana which people have asked about the future legality of. He starts carrying on about "selling it at schools to kids" in the biggest straw-man argument of all time. It is against natural law for the state to tell me what I can and can't imbibe, period.
I heard him talk about the flat 2% tax rate (income) about a year ago so again, that is a giant red flag and is against natural law.
Anarcho-Capitalism is a movement self-decribing as an individualist anarchist political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state and the elevation of the individual in a free market.
Anarcho-capitalism is a consistent version of capitalism, where coercive public monopolies would no longer exist.
Deontological anarcho-capitalists, such as Murray Rothbard, claim that no state is morally justified, and that the traditional functions of the state thus ought to be provided by voluntary human interaction. Others, such as David Friedman, claim that the state is economically and socially suboptimal and that non-physically coercive human interaction yields greater Marshallian efficiency.
Anarcho-Capitalism embraces the free market, which contrasts with collectivistic anarchist philosophy.
** It should be noted that most anarcho-capitalists define the words "capitalism," "free market" and "private property" differently from collectivistic anarchists. **
Anarcho-capitalists state that an employer-employee relationship may be a mutually profitable form of voluntary association. They resent government as a parasite that corrupts, biases, impedes and distorts what would otherwise be peaceful fair and free associations.
Anarcho-capitalists consider that in consenting to a contract, that each party was free to refuse, the contract is voluntary and therefore legitimate and beneficial, claiming any external power that attempts to prevent such relationship is itself an oppression.
Thus, anarcho-capitalists believe that an individual may choose to work in any manner they wish, be it for a wage or for some other means of payment, so long as there is no coercion involved.
"Ideologies fight over the best solution to our problems. Capitalism is the recognition that this one best answer does not exist. Capitalism says that all peaceful ideas, projects and systems are welcome. It says "we don't know the one best way," so people have to decide themselves what might be best for them, what kind of ideas and dreams they want to realize and what kinds of goods and services they should or shouldn't consume. You are free to try anything so long as you don't use force against other people or force them to pay for your projects. Capitalism is the system that leaves the economic decisions to the people, instead of the system."
I find Trump’s rhetoric about “death to drug dealers” very interesting. I will hold my opinion about Marijuana until after GA as I dont have first hand experience and I hear both sides from awakened circles.
As for Anarcho-Capitalism, let me ask you this hypothetical scenario. Lets say I hire you for some job and agree on terms and sign a contract. You deliver your services and I refuse to pay as per the contract saying I was not happy with your services. What will you do in this scenario?
The business of mj is over regulated. It should be made legal in all forms and no regs. We are supposed to be free. Free means free ad long as you don't step on another's rights.
"I find Trump’s rhetoric about “death to drug dealers” very interesting."
Trump is talking about the cartels who run "weapon of mass destruction" levels of drugs and people smuggle.
For example, there was enough Carfentanyl seized at the Canadian border to kill the whole population of Canada in one incident. These substances are being used as weapons against us ATM. I have no problem with what Trump is talking about.
"I will hold my opinion about Marijuana until after GA as I dont have first hand experience and I hear both sides from awakened circles."
This is not about opinion or efficacy, it is about natural law and the state cannot morally tell me what to take or not take, the substance is irrelevant. This is the Great Awakening and after going through all of this, the bullshit has to end.
"You deliver your services and I refuse to pay as per the contract saying I was not happy with your services."
"Others prefer that in an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, any formerly state-provided institutions or services that consumers demanded would be provided by voluntarily-funded or voluntarily-formed organizations, with defense and security being provided by private defense agencies or communal militias rather than through taxation, and where money is privately produced in an open market."
What this actually looks like in practice I have no idea, but I do know that the Founding Fathers only staved off a pure Orwellian nightmare for a couple of hundred years. The Constitutional Republic failed and now is the time for something based on Natural Law.
So let me see if I have this right. Carfentanyl is a deadly drug and the government absolutely has the right not just to tell people not to inject it, but to kill anyone who distributes it.
At the same time when it comes to Marijuana, not only questioning whether it might cause long term damages is irrelevant, the state has not right to tell you what you can take or not, the substance is irrelevant.
So the question that begs itself into being asked, is who gets to decide what is a deadly drug and whats not to be questioned? I am assuming a private FDA that you can hire (just like private defence agencies) that will tell you whats falls under substance is irrelevant and what doesnt?
As for the private defence agencies and communal militias - do you not see a problem there ? Those who can pay the most will control these militias (or the corruptible part of those militias) and with that control the whole community.
The point I am trying to make is beware of ideology thats coated in the particular flavor of sugar that you love.
If I were to ideologically poison patriotic people who love individualism and liberty, I would use exactly this.
Rule of thumb I follow: Anyone dealing in absolutes is pushing a potentially evil agenda. Reality is complex. We can take a good guess at the kind of social system that will work well.
Every person should first understand the true nature of our reality. No secrets (This is the GA)
Don't allow anyone to print fiat currency. Cut off the magic money, and 99% of our problems go away.
Small government with explicitly limited scope, and the will and knowledge by the people to enforce this.
New to me, whats this in reference to?
From what I remember, he wants sales tax. If he wants an income tax, no way Jose.
Taxing commerce is the only way to fund the government.- no matter how small it may be, but taxing indivduals is against natural laws (and unconstitutional) and I am always going to be against it - no matter how small the amount it.
Yeah be careful using these terms. You are better off using a new term rather than something that exists because a lot of people on the left who believe in anarchy look at it differently.
"New to me, what's this in reference to?"
Drugs all the way down to marijuana which people have asked about the future legality of. He starts carrying on about "selling it at schools to kids" in the biggest straw-man argument of all time. It is against natural law for the state to tell me what I can and can't imbibe, period.
I heard him talk about the flat 2% tax rate (income) about a year ago so again, that is a giant red flag and is against natural law.
Anarcho-Capitalism is a movement self-decribing as an individualist anarchist political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state and the elevation of the individual in a free market.
Anarcho-capitalism is a consistent version of capitalism, where coercive public monopolies would no longer exist.
Deontological anarcho-capitalists, such as Murray Rothbard, claim that no state is morally justified, and that the traditional functions of the state thus ought to be provided by voluntary human interaction. Others, such as David Friedman, claim that the state is economically and socially suboptimal and that non-physically coercive human interaction yields greater Marshallian efficiency.
Anarcho-Capitalism embraces the free market, which contrasts with collectivistic anarchist philosophy.
** It should be noted that most anarcho-capitalists define the words "capitalism," "free market" and "private property" differently from collectivistic anarchists. **
Anarcho-capitalists state that an employer-employee relationship may be a mutually profitable form of voluntary association. They resent government as a parasite that corrupts, biases, impedes and distorts what would otherwise be peaceful fair and free associations.
Anarcho-capitalists consider that in consenting to a contract, that each party was free to refuse, the contract is voluntary and therefore legitimate and beneficial, claiming any external power that attempts to prevent such relationship is itself an oppression.
Thus, anarcho-capitalists believe that an individual may choose to work in any manner they wish, be it for a wage or for some other means of payment, so long as there is no coercion involved.
"Ideologies fight over the best solution to our problems. Capitalism is the recognition that this one best answer does not exist. Capitalism says that all peaceful ideas, projects and systems are welcome. It says "we don't know the one best way," so people have to decide themselves what might be best for them, what kind of ideas and dreams they want to realize and what kinds of goods and services they should or shouldn't consume. You are free to try anything so long as you don't use force against other people or force them to pay for your projects. Capitalism is the system that leaves the economic decisions to the people, instead of the system."
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Anarcho-Capitalism
What's not to like?
I find Trump’s rhetoric about “death to drug dealers” very interesting. I will hold my opinion about Marijuana until after GA as I dont have first hand experience and I hear both sides from awakened circles.
As for Anarcho-Capitalism, let me ask you this hypothetical scenario. Lets say I hire you for some job and agree on terms and sign a contract. You deliver your services and I refuse to pay as per the contract saying I was not happy with your services. What will you do in this scenario?
The business of mj is over regulated. It should be made legal in all forms and no regs. We are supposed to be free. Free means free ad long as you don't step on another's rights.
Again the question becomes - would the same thing apply for hardcore drugs like Carfentenyl?
"I find Trump’s rhetoric about “death to drug dealers” very interesting."
Trump is talking about the cartels who run "weapon of mass destruction" levels of drugs and people smuggle.
For example, there was enough Carfentanyl seized at the Canadian border to kill the whole population of Canada in one incident. These substances are being used as weapons against us ATM. I have no problem with what Trump is talking about.
"I will hold my opinion about Marijuana until after GA as I dont have first hand experience and I hear both sides from awakened circles."
This is not about opinion or efficacy, it is about natural law and the state cannot morally tell me what to take or not take, the substance is irrelevant. This is the Great Awakening and after going through all of this, the bullshit has to end.
"You deliver your services and I refuse to pay as per the contract saying I was not happy with your services."
"Others prefer that in an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, any formerly state-provided institutions or services that consumers demanded would be provided by voluntarily-funded or voluntarily-formed organizations, with defense and security being provided by private defense agencies or communal militias rather than through taxation, and where money is privately produced in an open market."
What this actually looks like in practice I have no idea, but I do know that the Founding Fathers only staved off a pure Orwellian nightmare for a couple of hundred years. The Constitutional Republic failed and now is the time for something based on Natural Law.
So let me see if I have this right. Carfentanyl is a deadly drug and the government absolutely has the right not just to tell people not to inject it, but to kill anyone who distributes it.
At the same time when it comes to Marijuana, not only questioning whether it might cause long term damages is irrelevant, the state has not right to tell you what you can take or not, the substance is irrelevant.
So the question that begs itself into being asked, is who gets to decide what is a deadly drug and whats not to be questioned? I am assuming a private FDA that you can hire (just like private defence agencies) that will tell you whats falls under substance is irrelevant and what doesnt?
As for the private defence agencies and communal militias - do you not see a problem there ? Those who can pay the most will control these militias (or the corruptible part of those militias) and with that control the whole community.
The point I am trying to make is beware of ideology thats coated in the particular flavor of sugar that you love.
If I were to ideologically poison patriotic people who love individualism and liberty, I would use exactly this.
Rule of thumb I follow: Anyone dealing in absolutes is pushing a potentially evil agenda. Reality is complex. We can take a good guess at the kind of social system that will work well.
Every person should first understand the true nature of our reality. No secrets (This is the GA)
Don't allow anyone to print fiat currency. Cut off the magic money, and 99% of our problems go away.
Small government with explicitly limited scope, and the will and knowledge by the people to enforce this.